Governance and Participation in Policy Literature on Synthetic Biology-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Governance and Participation in Policy Literature on Synthetic Biology

Published:2023 Issue: Volume: Page:21-27
ISSN:2211-4548
Container-title:SpringerBriefs in Philosophy
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Siewert Stephanie,Kieslich Katharina,Braun Matthias,Dabrock Peter

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-031-16004-2_4

Reference28 articles.

1. Anderson J et al (2012) Engineering and ethical perspectives in synthetic biology. Rigorous, robust and predictable designs, public engagement and a modern ethical framework are vital to the continued success of synthetic biology. EMBO Rep 13(7):584–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.81. PMID: 22699939; PMCID: PMC3389334.

2. Bhattachary D, Calitz JP, Hunter A (2010) Synthetic biology dialogue report. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. Retrieved from https://bbsrc.ukri.org/documents/1006-synthetic-biology-dialogue-pdf/

3. Cummings CL, Kuzma J (2017) Societal risk evaluation scheme (SRES): scenario-based multi-criteria evaluation of synthetic biology applications. PLoS ONE 12(1):e0168564. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168564

4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften – acatech, Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften (2009) Synthetische Biologie. Wiley-VCH. Retrieved from http://www.leopoldina.org/uploads/tx_leopublication/2009_NatEmpf_synthetische_biologie-DE.pdf

5. Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften (2015) Die Synthetische Biologie in der öffentlichen Meinungsbildung. Diskussion Nr. 3. Leopoldina. Retrieved from https://www.leopoldina.org/uploads/tx_leopublication/2015_Synthetische_Biologie_DE_01.pdf