Abstract
AbstractThe paper traces the evolution the concept of socioeconomic vulnerability to climate change has followed in the academic and scientific debate and examines its effects on wellbeing. The recent recognition of vulnerability as a social construction has shifted the focus of the analysis to the dimension of adaptive capacity, restoring a political economy significance to the study of vulnerability. The social origin of vulnerability is related to the presence of structural inequalities, rooted in structural economic and political relationships and reinforced by historical cultural values and praxes. Structural inequalities and power relations in place within a society shape access to resources and capabilities that can enable individuals or population groups to prevent and cope with impacts from extreme weather events, ultimately defining vulnerabilities. Widespread vulnerabilities to climate change can compromise wellbeing in several ways, including an increase in food insecurity, health issues, outbreak of armed conflicts and mass migrations. In addition, the same individual or population group can be vulnerable in more than one wellbeing dimension and, once a dimension is affected, their own vulnerability to other threats is likely to increase.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Ferrara
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Finance
Reference134 articles.
1. Adger, W. N., & Kelly, P. M. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 4(3–4), 253–266.
2. Arora-Jonsson, S. (2011). Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender and climate change. Global environmental change, 21(2), 744–751.
3. Ash, M., & Boyce, J. K. (2018). Racial disparities in pollution exposure and employment at US industrial facilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(42), 10636–10641.
4. Bahadur, A. V., & Tanner, T. (2014). Transformational resilience thinking: Putting people, power and politics at the heart of Urban Climate Resilience. Urbanization and Environment, 26(1), 200–214.
5. Bankoff, G., Frerks, G., & Hilhorst, D. (Eds.). (2004). Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development and people. London: Earthscan.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献