Author:
Sabela-Rikhotso Phindile Tiyiselani Zanele,van Niekerk Dewald,Nemakonde Livhuwani David
Abstract
AbstractAlthough multi-sectoral coordination in disaster risk management has been progressing in South Africa for over two decades, there has been limited commitment to an integrated regime in managing marine oil spill incidents. Poor incident management persists despite the availability of data, protocols, legislation, and resources housed in different government and private sector entities. This study identified practices that enhance a coordination process for the effective management of oil spill pollution. A grounded theory approach is applied to the coordination issue, which is characterized by an interactive process of simultaneously considering theoretical grounding during our empirical research. Empirical evidence includes observations of 47 meetings and three oil spill exercises with 79 delegates from 32 different organizations, which supports the coordination process of instituting a national Incident Management System for marine oil spills in South Africa. An additional 44 individual open-ended questionnaires supplement this earlier body of evidence for data triangulation and validation. Analysis of development of the Incident Management System process revealed that, when designing a novel long-term project that is reliant on a shared vision from multiple organizations, enhanced coordination and collaboration for successful implementation is dependent on the following practices: (1) obtaining political commitment, (2) bridging knowledge gaps, and (3) sharing resources.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Safety Research,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference30 articles.
1. Bahrami, P., A. Ardalan, A. Nejati, A. Ostadtaghizadeh, and A. Yari. 2020. Factors affecting the effectiveness of hospital incident command system; findings from a systematic review. Bulletin of Emergency and Trauma 8(2): 62–76.
2. Bigley, G.A., and K.H. Roberts. 2001. The incident command system: High-reliability organising for complex and volatile task environments. Academy of Management Journal 44(6): 1281–1299.
3. Boersma, K., L. Comfort, J. Groenendaal, and J. Wolbers. 2014. Incident command systems: A dynamic tension among goals, rules and practice. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 22(1): 1–4.
4. Buck, D.A., J.E. Trainor, and B.E. Aguirre. 2006. A critical evaluation of the incident command system and NIMS. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 3(3): Article 1.
5. Bunge, M., and R. Ardila. 1987. The social matrix of behavior. In Philosophy of psychology, ed. M. Bunge, and R. Ardila, 221–232. New York: Springer.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献