Automated reference tissue normalization of T2-weighted MR images of the prostate using object recognition
-
Published:2020-07-31
Issue:2
Volume:34
Page:309-321
-
ISSN:0968-5243
-
Container-title:Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Magn Reson Mater Phy
Author:
Sunoqrot Mohammed R. S.ORCID, Nketiah Gabriel A., Selnæs Kirsten M., Bathen Tone F., Elschot Mattijs
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To develop and evaluate an automated method for prostate T2-weighted (T2W) image normalization using dual-reference (fat and muscle) tissue.
Materials and methods
Transverse T2W images from the publicly available PROMISE12 (N = 80) and PROSTATEx (N = 202) challenge datasets, and an in-house collected dataset (N = 60) were used. Aggregate channel features object detectors were trained to detect reference fat and muscle tissue regions, which were processed and utilized to normalize the 3D images by linear scaling. Mean prostate pseudo T2 values after normalization were compared to literature values. Inter-patient histogram intersections of voxel intensities in the prostate were compared between our approach, the original images, and other commonly used normalization methods. Healthy vs. malignant tissue classification performance was compared before and after normalization.
Results
The prostate pseudo T2 values of the three tested datasets (mean ± standard deviation = 78.49 ± 9.42, 79.69 ± 6.34 and 79.29 ± 6.30 ms) corresponded well to T2 values from literature (80 ± 34 ms). Our normalization approach resulted in significantly higher (p < 0.001) inter-patient histogram intersections (median = 0.746) than the original images (median = 0.417) and most other normalization methods. Healthy vs. malignant classification also improved significantly (p < 0.001) in peripheral (AUC 0.826 vs. 0.769) and transition (AUC 0.743 vs. 0.678) zones.
Conclusion
An automated dual-reference tissue normalization of T2W images could help improve the quantitative assessment of prostate cancer.
Funder
Norges Forskningsråd Norwegian University of Science and Technology Biotechnology The liaison Committee between the Central Norway Regional Health Authority and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology,Biophysics
Reference35 articles.
1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424 2. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, Rouviere O, Logager V, Futterer JJ (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22(4):746–757 3. Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ, Margolis D, Schnall MD, Shtern F, Tempany CM, Thoeny HC, Verma S (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging—reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69(1):16–40 4. Hoeks CM, Barentsz JO, Hambrock T, Yakar D, Somford DM, Heijmink SW, Scheenen TW, Vos PC, Huisman H, van Oort IM, Witjes JA, Heerschap A, Futterer JJ (2011) Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. Radiology 261(1):46–66 5. Wang S, Burtt K, Turkbey B, Choyke P, Summers RM (2014) Computer aided-diagnosis of prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI: a technical review of current research. Biomed Res Int 2014:789561
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|