Affiliation:
1. Department of Radiation Oncology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami Florida USA
2. Desai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami Florida USA
3. Department of Radiology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami Florida USA
4. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami Florida USA
Abstract
AbstractQuantitative T2‐weighted MRI (T2W) interpretation is impeded by the variability of acquisition‐related features, such as field strength, coil type, signal amplification, and pulse sequence parameters. The main purpose of this work is to develop an automated method for prostate T2W intensity normalization. The procedure includes the following: (i) a deep learning‐based network utilizing MASK R‐CNN for automatic segmentation of three reference tissues: gluteus maximus muscle, femur, and bladder; (ii) fitting a spline function between average intensities in these structures and reference values; and (iii) using the function to transform all T2W intensities. The T2W distributions in the prostate cancer regions of interest (ROIs) and normal appearing prostate tissue (NAT) were compared before and after normalization using Student's t‐test. The ROIs' T2W associations with the Gleason Score (GS), Decipher genomic score, and a three‐tier prostate cancer risk were evaluated with Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rS). T2W differences in indolent and aggressive prostate cancer lesions were also assessed. The MASK R‐CNN was trained with manual contours from 32 patients. The normalization procedure was applied to an independent MRI dataset from 83 patients. T2W differences between ROIs and NAT significantly increased after normalization. T2W intensities in 231 biopsy ROIs were significantly negatively correlated with GS (rS = −0.21, p = 0.001), Decipher (rS = −0.193, p = 0.003), and three‐tier risk (rS = −0.235, p < 0.001). The average T2W intensities in the aggressive ROIs were significantly lower than in the indolent ROIs after normalization. In conclusion, the automated triple‐reference tissue normalization method significantly improved the discrimination between prostate cancer and normal prostate tissue. In addition, the normalized T2W intensities of cancer exhibited a significant association with tumor aggressiveness. By improving the quantitative utilization of the T2W in the assessment of prostate cancer on MRI, the new normalization method represents an important advance over clinical protocols that do not include sequences for the measurement of T2 relaxation times.
Funder
National Cancer Institute
Subject
Spectroscopy,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Molecular Medicine