Support Vector Machine-Based Classifier for the Assessment of Finger Movement of Stroke Patients Undergoing Rehabilitation
-
Published:2019-09-12
Issue:1
Volume:40
Page:91-100
-
ISSN:1609-0985
-
Container-title:Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J. Med. Biol. Eng.
Author:
Hamaguchi ToyohiroORCID, Saito Takeshi, Suzuki Makoto, Ishioka Toshiyuki, Tomisawa Yamato, Nakaya Naoki, Abo Masahiro
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Traditionally, clinical evaluation of motor paralysis following stroke has been of value to physicians and therapists because it allows for immediate pathophysiological assessment without the need for specialized tools. However, current clinical methods do not provide objective quantification of movement; therefore, they are of limited use to physicians and therapists when assessing responses to rehabilitation. The present study aimed to create a support vector machine (SVM)-based classifier to analyze and validate finger kinematics using the leap motion controller. Results were compared with those of 24 stroke patients assessed by therapists.
Methods
A non-linear SVM was used to classify data according to the Brunnstrom recovery stages of finger movements by focusing on peak angle and peak velocity patterns during finger flexion and extension. One thousand bootstrap data values were generated by randomly drawing a series of sample data from the actual normalized kinematics-related data. Bootstrap data values were randomly classified into training (940) and testing (60) datasets. After establishing an SVM classification model by training with the normalized kinematics-related parameters of peak angle and peak velocity, the testing dataset was assigned to predict classification of paralytic movements.
Results
High separation accuracy was obtained (mean 0.863; 95% confidence interval 0.857–0.869; p = 0.006).
Conclusion
This study highlights the ability of artificial intelligence to assist physicians and therapists evaluating hand movement recovery of stroke patients.
Funder
grant-in-aid from Saitama Prefectural University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Biomedical Engineering,General Medicine
Reference40 articles.
1. Coupar, F., Pollock, A., Rowe, P., Weir, C., & Langhorne, P. (2012). Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation,26(4), 291–313.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215511420305
. 2. Hou, L., Du, X., Chen, L., Li, J., Yan, P., Zhou, M., et al. (2018). Exercise and quality of life after first-ever ischaemic stroke: A two-year follow-up study. International Journal of Neuroscience,128(6), 540–548.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2017.1400971
. 3. DeJong, S. L., Birkenmeier, R. L., & Lang, C. E. (2012). Person-specific changes in motor performance accompany upper extremity functional gains after stroke. Journal of Applied Biomechanics,28(3), 304–316. 4. McCrea, P. H., Eng, J. J., & Hodgson, A. J. (2002). Biomechanics of reaching: Clinical implications for individuals with acquired brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation,24(10), 534–541.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280110115393
. 5. Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Jaasko, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine,7(1), 13–31.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|