Synergies in Innovation: Lessons Learnt from Innovation Ethics for Responsible Innovation

Author:

Bourban MichelORCID,Rochel Johan

Abstract

AbstractThis paper draws on the emerging field of innovation ethics (IE) to complement the more established field of responsible innovation (RI) by focusing on key ethical issues raised by technological innovations. One key limitation of influential frameworks of RI is that they tend to neglect some key ethical issues raised by innovation, as well as major normative dimensions of the notion of responsibility. We explain how IE could enrich RI by stressing the more important role that ethical analysis should play in RI. We focus on two transversal issues of IE: the issue of redrawing conceptual boundaries, especially the topic of the artificialization of the world, and the issue of responsibility, especially the notion of total responsibility. We address these two issues from the thematic perspective of IE, thereby generating lessons learnt for RI. These two examples are taken as illustrations and blueprint of the dialogue that should take place between the two fields.

Funder

Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy

Reference68 articles.

1. Blok, V. (2018). Philosophy of innovation: a research agenda. Philosophy of Management, 17(1), 1–5.

2. Blok, V. (Forthcoming). “Towards an ontology of innovation: on the new, the political-economic dimension and the intrinsic risks involved in innovation processes”. In Michelfelder, D., & Doorn, N. Routledge handbook of philosophy of engineering. London/New York: Routledge.

3. Blok, V., & Lemmens, P. (2015). The emerging concept of responsible innovation. Three reasons why it is questionable and calls for a radical transformation of the concept of innovation. In B.-J. Koops et al. (Eds.), Responsible innovation 2. Concepts, approaches, and applications (pp. 19–35). Dordrecht: Springer.

4. Bontems, V. K. (2014). What does Innovation stand for? Review of a watchword in research policies. Journal of Innovation Economics, 15(3), 39.

5. Bloodworth, M. N. (2017). Sport, society, and anti-doping policy: an ethical overview. Medicine and Sport Science, 62, 177–185.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3