Abstract
AbstractIn 2017, the German ethics commission for automated and connected driving released 20 ethical guidelines for autonomous vehicles. It is now up to the research and industrial sectors to enhance the development of autonomous vehicles based on such guidelines. In the current state of the art, we find studies on how ethical theories can be integrated. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no framework for motion planning has yet been published which allows for the true implementation of any practical ethical policies. This paper makes four contributions: Firstly, we briefly present the state of the art based on recent works concerning unavoidable accidents of autonomous vehicles (AVs) and identify further need for research. While most of the research focuses on decision strategies in moral dilemmas or crash optimization, we aim to develop an ethical trajectory planning for all situations on public roads. Secondly, we discuss several ethical theories and argue for the adoption of the theory “ethics of risk.” Thirdly, we propose a new framework for trajectory planning, with uncertainties and an assessment of risks. In this framework, we transform ethical specifications into mathematical equations and thus create the basis for the programming of an ethical trajectory. We present a risk cost function for trajectory planning that considers minimization of the overall risk, priority for the worst-off and equal treatment of people. Finally, we build a connection between the widely discussed trolley problem and our proposed framework.
Funder
Technische Universität München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference61 articles.
1. Alexander, L., and Moore, M. “Deontological ethics”, The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
2. Asimov, I. (1950). I, Robot. Fawcett Publications.
3. Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J. F., & Rahwan, I. (2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563(7729), 59–64.
4. Bansal, M., Krizhevsky, A., and Ogale, A, (2018). “ChauffeurNet: Learning to drive by imitating the best and synthesizing the worst.” Pp. 1–20 in Robotics: Science and Systems 2019
5. Bartneck, C., Lütge, C., Wagner, A., & Welsh, S. (2019). Ethik in KI und Robotik. Hanser.
Cited by
52 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献