The Dialectics of Action and Technology in the Philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre

Author:

Siegler MarcelORCID

Abstract

Abstract This investigation provides an in-depth exploration of the dialectics of action and technology in the works of French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, both in terms of the concrete use contexts of technological artifacts and the entanglement between individual agents and their sociotechnical surroundings. Furthermore, it briefly outlines some potentials of Sartre’s thoughts for debates in contemporary philosophy of technology. Throughout his works, Sartre approaches human action from different yet dialectically interrelated perspectives that are always accompanied by and developed in relation to reflections about technology. Against the background of a complementary conception of human action that is derived from Sartre’s major works, the implementation of matter in the course of action primarily represents an instrumentalization. Things are thus always disclosed as implement things due to the practical character of human existence. Although things do not prescribe action, the material characteristics and properties of these things render them more useful for attaining some and more adverse for attaining other ends. Despite the ontological freedom of human beings, their position in societal forms of organization, to which Sartre refers to as practical ensembles, delimits their choice of means and necessitates them to satisfy their needs and desires with the limited means available. In this way, la force des choses arises, not as a result of the characteristics of technology but as an outcome of sociality and politics.

Funder

Technische Universität Darmstadt

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy

Reference51 articles.

1. Ally, M. C. (2017). Ecology and Existence. Lexington Books.

2. Aronson, R. (2019). Revisiting existential Marxism. Sartre Studies. International, 25(2), 92–98.

3. Aronson, R. (2020). Existential Marxism. In M. C. Eshleman & C. L. Mui (Eds.), The Sartrean Mind (pp. 327–339). Routledge.

4. Betschart, A. (2019). Sartre was not a Marxist. Sartre Studies International, 25(2), 77–91.

5. Blättler, C. (2012). Serial Sixties auf Französisch Zur Ambivalenz der Serie. Zeitschrift Für Medienwissenschaft, 7(2), 70–79.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Contents;Needful Structures;2023-07-06

2. 5. Praxis of Practical Ensembles: Bodies in Motion;Needful Structures;2023-07-06

3. 1. From Individual Project to Historical Praxis;Needful Structures;2023-07-06

4. Needful Structures;Edition panta rei;2023-07-06

5. Frontmatter;Needful Structures;2023-07-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3