Abstract
Ronald Aronson praises Jean-Paul Sartre’s existential Marxism in an essay in the Boston Review. I argue that existential Marxism is a case of a contradictio in adiecto. Sartre was never recognized as a Marxist by his contemporaries. He not only failed to show any interest in the question of economic exploitation, but most of the answers he gave in the Critique even contradicted Marxist theory. His expression of Marxism as the philosophy of our time seems to have rather been more an act of courtesy than the expression of deep conviction. As Sartre himself later said, Marxism and existentialism are quite separate philosophies.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Philosophy
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Needful Structures;Edition panta rei;2023-07-12
2. Contents;Needful Structures;2023-07-06
3. 5. Praxis of Practical Ensembles: Bodies in Motion;Needful Structures;2023-07-06
4. 1. From Individual Project to Historical Praxis;Needful Structures;2023-07-06
5. Needful Structures;Edition panta rei;2023-07-06