Abstract
AbstractExposure models for regional seismic risk assessment often place assets at the centroids of administrative units for which data are available. At best, a top-down approach is followed, where such data are spatially disaggregated over a denser spatial grid, using proxy datasets such as the distribution of population or the density of night-time lights. The resolution of the spatial grid is either dictated by the resolution of the proxy dataset, or by constraints in computational resources. On the other hand, if a building-by-building database is available, it often needs to be aggregated and brought to a resolution that ensures acceptable calculation runtimes and memory demands. Several studies have now investigated the impact of exposure aggregation on loss estimates. Herein, unlike previous attempts, we can leverage upon an extensive building-by-building database for the Swiss territory, which we can use as ground truth. We firstly proceed to assess the aggregation-induced errors of standard risk metrics at different spatial scales. Then a new strategy for performing said aggregation is proposed, relying on a K-means clustering of site parameters and a reduction of the loss ratio uncertainty for aggregated assets. These interventions are designed with the objective of minimizing errors, while keeping the computational cost manageable.
Funder
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Bal IE, Bommer JJ, Stafford PJ et al (2010) The influence of geographical resolution of urban exposure data in an earthquake loss model for Istanbul. Earthq Spectra 26:619–634. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3459127
2. Bazzurro P, Park J (2007) The effects of portfolio manipulation on earthquake portfolio loss estimates. In: 10th international conference on applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering. Tokyo, Japan
3. Bergamo P, Fäh D, Panzera F, Cauzzi C, Glueer F, Perron V et al (2023) A site amplification model for Switzerland based on site-condition indicators and incorporating local response as measured at seismic stations. Bull Earthq Eng 1766:1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01766-z
4. Cauzzi C, Faccioli E (2008) Broadband (0.05 to 20 s) prediction of displacement response spectra based on worldwide digital records. J Seismol 12:453–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-008-9098-y
5. Chiou B-J, Youngs RR (2008) An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 24:173–215. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2894832