Author:
Adhikari Rohit Kumar,D’Ayala Dina
Abstract
AbstractThe residential building typology of Stone in Mud Mortar (SMM) masonry contributed significantly to the seismic losses caused by the 2015 Nepalese seismic sequence, also known as the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. SMM masonry is the most common construction type in Nepal, and notwithstanding the extensive damage, this has persisted in the post-earthquake reconstruction. This paper provides first an overview of the extent of damage and typical failure modes suffered by this typology. Some pressing issues in the ongoing post-earthquake reconstruction, such as building usability, construction quality are then discussed. The results of seismic analyses on both the pre-earthquake (PRE-SMM) and post-earthquake built (POST-SMM) typologies, using the applied element method employing a modelling strategy that accounts for the random shape of stone units, are then presented and discussed in terms of capacity curves and failure mechanisms. As per the seismic design code of Nepal, seismic performance assessment is conducted to understand the seismic design levels of these constructions. Finally, seismic fragility and vulnerability functions for both the PRE-SMM and POST-SMM typologies, considering the uncertainty in ground motions and material quality, are presented and discussed. Considering the seismic hazard in Nepal, the PRE-SMM typology is found to be highly vulnerable and seismic strengthening of these buildings is urgent. On the other hand, the POST-SMM typology has adequate seismic capacity and performs within the serviceability limit, given the quality of both the construction materials and workmanship are not compromised.
Funder
Institution of Structural Engineers UK
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference73 articles.
1. Adhikari RK, D’Ayala D (2019a) 2015 Nepal earthquake: seismic performance and post-earthquake reconstruction of stone masonry buildings. EEFIT report, Institution of Structural Engineers, UK
2. Adhikari RK, D’Ayala D (2019b) Applied element modelling and pushover analysis of unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible roof diaphragm. In: 7th international conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, Crete, Greece
3. Bothara JK, Ahmad, N, Ingham J, Dizhur D (2019) Experimental seismic testing of semi-reinforced stone masonry building in mud mortar. In: 2019 Pacific conference on earthquake engineering and annual NZSEE conference, Auckland, New Zealand
4. Ahmad N, Ali Q, Crowley H, Pinho R (2014) Earthquake loss estimation of residential buildings in Pakistan. Nat Hazards 73(3):1889–1955
5. ASI (2018) Extreme loading for structures V6. Applied Science International LLC, Durham
Cited by
59 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献