Abstract
AbstractThe 2012 Emilia-Romagna earthquake, that mainly struck the homonymous Italian region provoking 28 casualties and damage to thousands of structures and infrastructures, is an exceptional source of information to question, investigate, and challenge the validity of seismic fragility functions and loss curves from an empirical standpoint. Among the most recent seismic events taking place in Europe, that of Emilia-Romagna is quite likely one of the best documented, not only in terms of experienced damages, but also for what concerns occurred losses and necessary reconstruction costs. In fact, in order to manage the compensations in a fair way both to citizens and business owners, soon after the seismic sequence, the regional administrative authority started (1) collecting damage and consequence-related data, (2) evaluating information sources and (3) taking care of the cross-checking of various reports. A specific database—so-called Sistema Informativo Gestione Europa (SFINGE)—was devoted to damaged business activities. As a result, 7 years after the seismic events, scientists can rely on a one-of-a-kind, vast and consistent database, containing information about (among other things): (1) buildings’ location and dimensions, (2) occurred structural damages, (3) experienced direct economic losses and (4) related reconstruction costs. The present work is focused on a specific data subset of SFINGE, whose elements are Long-Span-Beam buildings (mostly precast) deployed for business activities in industry, trade or agriculture. With the available set of data, empirical fragility functions, cost and loss ratio curves are elaborated, that may be included within existing Performance Based Earthquake Engineering assessment toolkits.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference57 articles.
1. ATC, Applied Technology Council (2012) Seismic performance assessment of buildings, FEMA P-58, volumes 1–3, http://www.atcouncil.org. Accessed 12 July 2019
2. ARR, Agenzia regionale per la ricostruzione—Sisma 2012 (2018) Analisi economica della ricostruzione degli edifici produttivi. Centro Stampa Regione Emilia-Romagna, Bologna, p 145. ISBN 9788890737091 (in Italian)
3. Aslani H (2005) Probabilistic earthquake loss estimation and loss disaggregation in buildings. Ph.D. Thesis, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Centre, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Stanford University, p 382
4. Belleri A, Brunesi E, Nascimbene R, Pagani M, Riva P (2015) Seismic performance of precast industrial facilities following major earthquakes in the Italian territory. J Perform Constr Facil. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000617
5. Bellotti C, Casotto C, Crowley H, Deyanova MG, Germagnoli F, Fianchisti G et al (2014) Single-storey precast buildings: probabilistic distribution of structural systems and subsystems from the sixties. Progettazione Sismica 5:41–70
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献