Abstract
AbstractDespite the importance of network analysis in biological practice, dominant models of scientific explanation do not account satisfactorily for how this family of explanations gain their explanatory power in every specific application. This insufficiency is particularly salient in the study of the ecology of the microbiome. Drawing on Coyte et al. (2015) study of the ecology of the microbiome, Deulofeu et al. (2021) argue that these explanations are neither mechanistic, nor purely mathematical, yet they are substantially empirical. Building on their criticisms, in the present work we make a step further elucidating this kind of explanations with a general analytical framework according to which scientific explanations are ampliative, specialized embeddings (ASE), which has recently been successfully applied to other biological subfields. We use ASE to reconstruct in detail the Coyte et al.’s case study and on its basis, we claim that network explanations of the ecology of the microbiome, and other similar explanations in ecology, gain their epistemological force in virtue of their capacity to embed biological phenomena in non-accidental generalizations that are simultaneously ampliative and specialized.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference94 articles.
1. Alleva, K., & Federico, L. (2013). A structuralist analysis of Hill’s theories: An elucidation of explanation in Biochemistry. Scientiae Studia, 11(2), 333–353.
2. Alleva, K., Díez, J., & Federico, L. (2017). Models, theory structure and mechanisms in biochemistry: The case of allosterism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C, 63, 1–14.
3. Ankeny, R. (2000). Fashioning descriptive models in biology. Philosophy of Science, 67(3), 272.
4. Balzer, W., & Moulines, C. (1981). Die Grundstruktur der klassischen Partikelmechanik und ihre Spezialfsierungen. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A, 36(6), 600–608.
5. Balzer, W., & Moulines, C. U. (1998). Structuralist theory of science: Paradigmatic reconstructions. Rodopi.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献