Abstract
AbstractThis paper presents an account of the nature of stem cells based on the philosophical concept of disposition. It is argued that stem cells can be conceived as dispositional objects, and adopting this attitude allows overcoming some of the controversies surrounding the nature of stemness (most notably, the state vs. entity debate) because it offers a framework that accommodates the lessons from different theories. Additionally, the account is simultaneously useful for interpreting stem cell experiments and guiding potential interventions. The account shows how different levels, both molecular and emergent network-level, play the primary causal role in explaining some empirical results, and hence they suggest that the explanations can be mechanistic or topological, respectively. The realization that any of these levels may play a more prominent causal role than another allows suggesting interventions at the genetic, molecular and population levels.
Funder
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Universidad de Oviedo
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Philosophy
Reference68 articles.
1. Austin C (2017) Evo-Devo: a science of dispositions. Eur J Philos Sci 7(2):373–389
2. Austin CJ, Nuño de la Rosa L (2021) Dispositional properties in Evo-Devo. In: Nuño de la Rosa L, Müller GB (eds) Evolutionary developmental biology. Springer, Cham
3. Brigandt J, Green S, O’Malley MA (2017) Systems biology and mechanistic explanation. In: Glennan S, Illari P (eds) The Routledge handbook of mechanisms and mechanical philosophy. Routledge, London
4. Brigandt I, Villegas C, Love AC, Nuño de la Rosa L (2023) Evolvability as a disposition: philosophical distinctions, scientific implications. In: Hansen TF, Houle D, Pavličev M, Pélabon C (eds) Evolvability: a unifying concept in evolutionary biology? The MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 55–72
5. Chang H (2012) Is water H2O? Evidence, realism and pluralism. Springer, Heidelberg
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. An epistemic argument for evolutionary dispositions;THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science;2024-05-13