The Hows and whys of philosophy of science teaching: a comparative analysis

Author:

de Regt Henk W.ORCID,Koster EdwinORCID

Abstract

AbstractWhat makes teaching philosophy of science to non-philosophy students different from teaching it to philosophy students, and how should lecturers in philosophy adapt to an audience of practitioners of a field of study that they are reflecting on? In this paper we address this question by analyzing the differences between these student groups, and based on this analysis we make suggestions as to how philosophy of science can be taught to non-philosophy students in an effective and attractive way. Starting-point is the observation that not only the background knowledge and interests of these students but also the aims of the respective courses will differ. We present a comparative analysis of the demands and conditions for teaching philosophy of science to the different types of students, focusing on learning objectives and didactic approaches. Next, we apply our analysis to a concrete example, the role of values in science, and discuss how this may be taught to either philosophy students or non-philosophy students. Finally, we discuss an alternative format for teaching philosophy to non-philosophy students.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy

Reference32 articles.

1. Aalberts, J., Koster, E., & Boschhuizen, R. (2012). From prejudice to reasonable judgement. Integrating (moral) value discussions in university courses. Journal of Moral Education, 41, 437–455.

2. Borge, S., & McNamee, M. (2017). Football and philosophy. In J. Hughson, K. Moore, R. Spaaij, & J. Maguire (Eds.), Routledge handbook of football studies (pp. 245–256). Routledge.

3. Corrigan, D. J., Dillon, J. & Gunstone, R. F. (Eds.) (2007). The re-emergence of values in science education. Sense Publishers.

4. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Heath & Co.

5. Douglas, H. E. (2004). The irreducible complexity of objectivity. Synthese, 138, 453–473.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Inclusivity in the Education of Scientific Imagination;The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology;2024

2. Renewing an undergraduate science curriculum for the 21st century;Frontiers in Education;2023-11-28

3. Teaching philosophy of science that matters;European Journal for Philosophy of Science;2023-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3