Abstract
AbstractIt has been much debated whether epistemic relativism in academia, for instance in the form of social constructivism, the strong programme, deconstructionism, and postmodernism, has paved the way for the recent upsurge in science denial, in particular climate science denial. In order to provide an empirical basis for this discussion, an extensive search of the social science literature was performed. It showed that in the 1990s, climate science was a popular target among academic epistemic relativists. In particular, many STS scholars used it as an allegedly clear example of claims by natural scientists that should be treated as mere social constructions, rather than as reports on the actual state of the natural world. A few connections between social constructivists and corporate science denialism were also uncovered, but the extent of such connections could not be determined. With few exceptions, the stream of criticism of climate science from academic relativists has dwindled since the 1990s. One reason for this seems to be that the contrarian position lost its attraction when it became associated with corporate and right-wing propagandists.
Funder
Royal Institute of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference134 articles.
1. American Anthropological Association, Executive Board. (1947). Statement on human rights. American Anthropologist, 49(4), 539–543.
2. Antonio, R. J., & Clark, B. (2015). The climate change divide in social theory. In R. E. Dunlap & R. J. Brulle (Eds.), Climate change and society (pp. 333–368). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Ashmore, M. (1993). The theatre of the blind: Starring a promethean prankster, a phoney phenomenon, a prism, a pocket, and a piece of wood. Social Studies of Science, 23(1), 67–106.
4. Ashmore, M. (1996). Ending up on the wrong side: Must the two forms of radicalism always be at war? Social Studies of Science, 26(2), 305–322.
5. Baker, E., & Oreskes, N. (2017). It’s no game: Post-truth and the obligations of science studies. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 6(8), 1–10.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献