Abstract
AbstractThe ecosystem service (ES) approach usually addresses soil erosion as the regulating service control of erosion rates or soil retention. In addition to the assessment of this regulating ES, mitigated impacts on soil-related ES by preventing soil erosion can be assessed. This study presents a scenario-based approach for the assessment of the impact of soil erosion on soil-related ES. The assessment approach was tested in agricultural landscapes in Northern Germany, combining mapping and assessment of soil-related ES. In six scenarios, the degradation of soils due to soil erosion was simulated by the calculation of soil profile reductions. The scenarios represent two levels of impact with three time steps (+50, +100, +150 years). In the scenarios for the structural impact, the potential soil erosion rates were extrapolated into the future to generate spatially explicit information on degraded soils. In the scenarios for the mitigated impact, the actual soil erosion rates were extrapolated. Four soil-related ES were assessed for the initial state and the scenarios crop provision, water filtration, water flow regulation and fresh water provision. The comparison of the potential service supply of the four soil-related ES in the scenarios enabled the assessment of the long-term effect of the ES control of erosion rates. The mitigated reduction in the potential service supply for three of the considered ES (crop provision, water filtration, water flow regulation) is large and highlights the importance of sustainable soil management. Contrary to this, the ES fresh water provision benefits of erosion-induced soil profile reductions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Pollution,General Environmental Science,General Medicine
Reference54 articles.
1. Adhikari, K., & Hartemink, A. E. (2016). Linking soils to ecosystem services—A global review. Geoderma, 262, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.009.
2. Bastian, O., Syrbe, R.-U., Rosenberg, M., Rahe, D., & Grunewald, K. (2013). The five pillar EPPS framework for quantifying, mapping and managing ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 4, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.003.
3. Bock, M., Conrad, O., Günther, A., Gehrt, E., Baritz, R., & Böhner, J. (2018). SaLEM (v1.0)–the Soil and Landscape Evolution Model (SaLEM) for simulation of regolith depth in periglacial environments. Geoscientific Model Development, 11, 1641–1652. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1641-2018.
4. Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR). (2014). Potentielle Erosionsgefährdung der Ackerböden durch Wasser in Deutschland 1:1.000.000 (Potential soil erosion risk on arable soils in Germany 1:1,000,000). https://download.bgr.de/bgr/Boden/PEGWASSER1000/geotiff/pegwasser1000_250_v10.zip. Accessed 31 Aug 2017.
5. Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献