A systematic review of shared decision making interventions in child and youth mental health: synthesising the use of theory, intervention functions, and behaviour change techniques

Author:

Hayes DanielORCID,Edbrooke-Childs Julian,Town Rosa,Wolpert Miranda,Midgley Nick

Abstract

AbstractReviews around interventions to improve shared decision making (SDM) for child and youth mental health have produced inconclusive findings on what approaches increase participation. Importantly, the previous reviews did not explore the use of theory, as well as mechanisms of change (intervention functions) and active units of change (behaviour change techniques). The aim of this review was to explore these factors and ascertain how, if at all, these contribute to SDM. Five databases were searched up until April 2020. Studies met inclusion criteria if they were: (a) an intervention to facilitate SDM; (b) aimed at children, adolescence, or young people aged up to 25, with a mental health difficulty, or their parents/guardians; and (c) included a control group. Data were extracted on patient characteristics, study design, intervention, theoretical background, intervention functions, behaviour change techniques, and SDM. Quality assessment of the studies was undertaken using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool. Eight different interventions met inclusion criteria. The role of theory to increase SDM remains unclear. Specific intervention functions, such as ‘education’ on SDM and treatment options and ‘environmental restructuring’ using decision aids, are being used in SDM interventions, as well as ‘training’ for clinicians. Similarly, behaviour change techniques linked to these, such as ‘adding objects to the environment’, ‘discussing pros/cons’, and clinicians engaging in ‘behavioural practice/rehearsal’. However, as most studies scored low on the quality assessment criteria, as well as a small number of studies included and a low number of behaviour change techniques utilised, links between behaviour change techniques, intervention functions and increased participation remain tentative. Intervention developers and clinicians may wish to consider specific intervention functions and behaviour change techniques to facilitate SDM.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Developmental and Educational Psychology,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference70 articles.

1. Ahmad N, Ellins J, Krelle H, Lawrie M (2014) Person-centred care: from ideas to action. Health Foundation, London, pp 1–100

2. Coulter A, Collins A (2011) Making shared decision making a reality. No decision about me, without me. Health Foundation, London

3. Coulter A (2009) Implementing shared decision making in the UK. Health Foundation, London

4. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes, at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44:681–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3

5. Alderson P (1992) In the genes or in the stars? Children’s competence to consent. J Med Ethics 18:119–124. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.18.3.119

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3