Forestry in the Face of Global Change: Results of a Global Survey of Professionals
-
Published:2023-11-13
Issue:6
Volume:9
Page:473-489
-
ISSN:2198-6436
-
Container-title:Current Forestry Reports
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Curr. For. Rep.
Author:
Himes Austin, Bauhus JürgenORCID, Adhikari Shankar, Barik Saroj Kanta, Brown Hugh, Brunner Andreas, Burton Philip J., Coll Lluís, D’Amato Anthony W., Diaci Jurij, Dorji Yonten, Foli Ernest G., Ganz David J., Hall Jefferson S., Keenan Rodney, Lu Yuanchang, Messier Christian, Munanura Ian, Piotto Daniel, Seifert Thomas, Sheil Douglas, Shorohova Ekaterina, Sisay Kibruyesfa, Soto Daniel, Tanaka Hiroshi, Umunay Peter, Velázquez-Martínez Alejandro, Puettmann Klaus J.
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
Forests support most global terrestrial biodiversity and contribute to the livelihood of billions of people, but these and other benefits are in jeopardy due to global change. This leads to questions, such as how to address the challenges of global change in forest management, given the lack of knowledge and deep uncertainty about future developments. In addition, many of the impediments to implement adaptation strategies are unknown.
Recent Findings
Here, we present an overview of results from a global survey of 754 forestry professionals (370 researchers and educators, 227 practicing foresters, 37 policymakers, 64 administrators, and 56 with other or unspecified roles) from 61 countries across 6 continents who were interested in global change issues. These professionals were asked about their opinion regarding three different adaptation strategies: resist, adapt, and transform. Most respondents agreed that the majority of global change factors will negatively influence the ability of forests to provide desired ecosystem services. Similarly, they agreed about major challenges when implementing adaptation strategies and specifically whether our current knowledge base is sufficient. These concerns were not limited to ecological aspects, but respondents also highlighted the need for a better appreciation of social/political and economic barriers, especially regarding transformation strategies. In addition, the response patterns, including differences due to economic status, highlight the importance of developing and evaluating adaptation strategies in a local social–ecological context.
Summary
Our study demonstrates a widespread perception on the part of forestry professionals around the world, especially among researchers and practitioners, that many global change factors will affect sustainable forest management negatively, resulting in the need for active silvicultural adaption. The results also suggest potential barriers to different adaptation strategies, particularly a relative lack of information and social acceptance for transform strategies. Further, this study highlights the importance of social and political factors and the need to understand the general public’s values regarding adaptation strategies as well as how the influence of public opinion is perceived by forest managers.
Funder
Fulbright Germany Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg im Breisgau
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Forestry
Reference64 articles.
1. FAO and UNEP. The State of the World’s Forests 2020. Forests, biodiversity and people. Rome. 2020. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8642en. 2. The World Bank. Forests for People, the Planet and Climate. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2020/03/19/forests-for-people-the-planet-andclimate#:~:text=Forests%20produce%20more%20than%205%2C000,%25%20of%20GDP%20in%20Cameroon. Date retrieved: 4/4/2023. 3. •• Anderegg WRL, Trugman AT, Badgley G, Anderson CM, Bartuska A, Ciais P, Cullenward D, Field CB, Freeman J, Goetz SJ, Hicke JA, Huntzinger D, Jackson RB, Nickerson J, Pacala S, Randerson RT. Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests. Sci. 2020;368(6497):eaaz7005. (Review article that synthesizes current scientific understanding of climate-driven risks to forests globally and methods for quantifying and modeling future risks. Suggests more holistic understanding of climate change risks are necessary for effective policy.) 4. Puettmann KJ. Silvicultural challenges and options in the context of global change: “simple” fixes and opportunities for new management approaches. J For. 2011;109:321–31. 5. Puettmann KJ, Messier C. Simple guidelines to prepare forests for global change: the dog and the frisbee. Northwest Sci. 2020;93:209–25. https://doi.org/10.3955/046.093.0305.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|