Promoting FAIR Data Through Community-driven Agile Design: the Open Data Commons for Spinal Cord Injury (odc-sci.org)

Author:

Torres-Espín AbelORCID,Almeida Carlos A.ORCID,Chou AustinORCID,Huie J. RussellORCID,Chiu MichaelORCID,Vavrek RomanaORCID,Sacramento JeffORCID,Orr Michael B.,Gensel John C.ORCID,Grethe Jeffery S.ORCID,Martone Maryann E.ORCID,Fouad KarimORCID,Ferguson Adam R.ORCID,Alilain Warren,Bacon Mark,Batty Nicholas,Beattie Michael,Bresnahan Jacqueline,Burnside Emily,Busch Sarah,Carpenter Randall,Quijorna Isaac Francos,Guo Xiaohui,Haggerty Agnes,Haroon Sarah,Harris Jack,Jakeman Lyn,Jones Linda,Kleitman Naomi,Kopper Timothy,Lane Michael,Magana Francisco,Magnuson David,Maldonado Ines,May Verena,McFarlane Katelyn,Morioka Kazuhito,Oudega Martin,Pascual Philip Leo,Poline Jean-Baptiste,Rosenzweig Ephron,Schmidt Emma,Tetzlaff Wolfram,Zholudeva Lana,

Abstract

AbstractThe past decade has seen accelerating movement from data protectionism in publishing toward open data sharing to improve reproducibility and translation of biomedical research. Developing data sharing infrastructures to meet these new demands remains a challenge. One model for data sharing involves simply attaching data, irrespective of its type, to publisher websites or general use repositories. However, some argue this creates a ‘data dump’ that does not promote the goals of making data Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR). Specialized data sharing communities offer an alternative model where data are curated by domain experts to make it both open and FAIR. We report on our experiences developing one such data-sharing ecosystem focusing on ‘long-tail’ preclinical data, the Open Data Commons for Spinal Cord Injury (odc-sci.org). ODC-SCI was developed with community-based agile design requirements directly pulled from a series of workshops with multiple stakeholders (researchers, consumers, non-profit funders, governmental agencies, journals, and industry members). ODC-SCI focuses on heterogeneous tabular data collected by preclinical researchers including bio-behaviour, histopathology findings and molecular endpoints. This has led to an example of a specialized neurocommons that is well-embraced by the community it aims to serve. In the present paper, we provide a review of the community-based design template and describe the adoption by the community including a high-level review of current data assets, publicly released datasets, and web analytics. Although odc-sci.org is in its late beta stage of development, it represents a successful example of a specialized data commons that may serve as a model for other fields.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Wings for Life

Craig H. Neilsen Foundation

International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Information Systems,General Neuroscience,Software

Reference50 articles.

1. Aguilar, R. M., & Steward, O. (2010). A bilateral cervical contusion injury model in mice: Assessment of gripping strength as a measure of forelimb motor function. Experimental Neurology, 221(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.09.028.

2. Almeida, C. A., Torres-Espin, A., Huie, J. R., Sun, D., Noble-Haeusslein, L. J., Young, W., Beattie, M. S., Bresnahan, J. C., Nielson, J. L., Ferguson, A. R. (2021). Excavating FAIR Data: the Case of the Multicenter Animal Spinal Cord Injury Study (MASCIS), Blood Pressure, and Neuro-Recovery. Neuroinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-021-09512-z.

3. Anderson, K. D., Sharp, K. G., Hofstadter, M., Irvine, K.-A., Murray, M., & Steward, O. (2009). Forelimb locomotor assessment scale (FLAS): Novel assessment of forelimb dysfunction after cervical spinal cord injury. Experimental Neurology, 220(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.08.020.

4. Basso, D. M., Beattie, M. S., & Bresnahan, J. C. (1995). A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. Journal of Neurotrauma, 12(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1995.12.1.

5. Basso, D. M., Beattie, M. S., Bresnahan, J. C., Anderson, D. K., Faden, A. I., Gruner, J. A., Holford, T. R., Hsu, C. Y., Noble, L. J., Nockels, R., Perot, P. L., Salzman, S. K., & Young, W. (1996). MASCIS evaluation of open field locomotor scores: Effects of experience and teamwork on reliability. Multicenter Animal Spinal Cord Injury Study. Journal of Neurotrauma, 13(7), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1996.13.343.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3