Abstract
AbstractArtificial intelligence (AI) has acquired notorious relevance in modern computing as it effectively solves complex tasks traditionally done by humans. AI provides methods to represent and infer knowledge, efficiently manipulate texts and learn from vast amount of data. These characteristics are applicable in many activities that human find laborious or repetitive, as is the case of the analysis of scientific literature. Manually preparing and writing a systematic literature review (SLR) takes considerable time and effort, since it requires planning a strategy, conducting the literature search and analysis, and reporting the findings. Depending on the area under study, the number of papers retrieved can be of hundreds or thousands, meaning that filtering those relevant ones and extracting the key information becomes a costly and error-prone process. However, some of the involved tasks are repetitive and, therefore, subject to automation by means of AI. In this paper, we present a survey of AI techniques proposed in the last 15 years to help researchers conduct systematic analyses of scientific literature. We describe the tasks currently supported, the types of algorithms applied, and available tools proposed in 34 primary studies. This survey also provides a historical perspective of the evolution of the field and the role that humans can play in an increasingly automated SLR process.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Junta de Andalucía
Universidad de Córdoba
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computational Mathematics,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Numerical Analysis,Theoretical Computer Science,Software
Reference51 articles.
1. Booth A, Sutton A, Papaioannou D (2016) Systematic approaches to a successful literature review, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, Cambridge
2. Kitchenham B, Charters S (2007) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Version 2.3 (EBSE-2007-01). School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf
3. Marshall C, Brereton P (2013) Tools to support systematic literature reviews in software engineering: a mapping study. In: International symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement. p. 296–299
4. van Dinter R, Tekinerdogan B, Catal C (2021) Automation of systematic literature reviews: a systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol 136:106589
5. Chapman AL, Morgan LC, Gartlehner G (2010) Semi-automating the manual literature search for systematic reviews increases efficiency. Health Inf Libr J 27(1):22–27
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献