Industrial Design education in Australia: a competence analysis across primary, secondary and tertiary education levels

Author:

Deighton Kathryn,Kuys BlairORCID,Tyagi Shivani

Abstract

AbstractIndustrial Design education is poorly understood by laypeople but is present in Australian curricula from primary through to tertiary education levels. Designers and design researchers have long recognised the value of the broad-ranging skills, knowledge fields, and personal qualities design education imparts, but this understanding is generally not shared by the wider community who may see design as surface decoration. This research identifies indicators of value and relevance taken from the twenty-first century competences literature, then measures their presence in four different Industrial Design education settings. Two studies were undertaken. First, Industrial Design educators from primary, secondary, and tertiary levels were surveyed. Then diverse Industrial Design education stakeholders from education and non-education settings were interviewed. The studies gathered both quantitative and qualitative data on the value and relevance of current Industrial Design education in Australia. The result is a comprehensive analysis of the twenty-first century competences present in Australian Industrial Design education, which concludes with recommendations for ways Industrial Design education can benefit twenty-first century learners, as well as ways it should evolve to remain relevant.

Funder

Swinburne University of Technology

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Engineering,Education

Reference136 articles.

1. Adesida, O., & Karuri-Sebina, M. G. (2013). Building innovation driven economies in Africa. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 5(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2013.798094

2. Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/218525261154

3. Anderson, M., Hinz, B., & Matus, H. (2017). The paradigm shifters: Entrepreneurial learning in schools. Research report, Mitchell Institute Report No. 04/2017. Mitchell Institute, Melbourne. www.mitchellinstitute.org.au.

4. Archer, L. B. (1984). Systematic method for designers. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 57–82). Chichester John Wiley. (Original work published in 1964).

5. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Labour force, Australia, Detailed, Quarterly, Aug 2018 (No. 6291.0.55.003). https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/6291.0.55.003Aug%202018?OpenDocument.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An empirical study on immersive technology in synchronous hybrid learning in design education;International Journal of Technology and Design Education;2023-10-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3