Abstract
AbstractThis study identifies structure pairs with the potential for simultaneous rupture in a coseismic period and quantifies their rupture recurrence intervals. To assess the potential for a multiple-structure rupture, we calculated the probability of Coulomb stress triggering between seismogenic structures in Taiwan. We assumed that a multiple-structure rupture would occur if two structures could trigger each other by enhancing the plane with thresholds of a Coulomb stress increase and the distance between the structures and identified various sets of seismogenic structure pairs accordingly. We discussed the uncertainty of multiple-structure pair identification from various thresholds of stress change and structure distances, effective friction coefficient, and rotation of rake angles. To estimate the recurrence intervals for multiple-structure ruptures, we implemented a scaling law and the Gutenberg-Richter law in which the slip rate could be partitioned based on the magnitudes of the individual structure and multiple-structure ruptures. Considering that one structure may be involved in multiple cases of multiple-structure ruptures, we developed new formulas for slip partitioning in a complex fault system. By implementing the range of rupture area and slip rate of each structure, the magnitudes and recurrence intervals of multiple-structure ruptures could be estimated. We discussed the epistemic uncertainties of recurrence interval from deviations of slip rate and rupture area, various empirical formula of rupture parameters. The multiple-structure rupture with a larger characteristic magnitude would be crucial for the safety evaluation of infrastructures.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Atmospheric Science,Oceanography
Reference34 articles.
1. Beeler N, Simpson R, Hickman S, Lockner D (2000) Pore fluid pressure, apparent friction, and Coulomb failure. J Geophys Res 105(25):533–625
2. Brodsky EE, van der Elst NJ (2014) The uses of dynamic earthquake triggering. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 42:317–339
3. Catalli F, Chan CH (2012) New insights into the application of the Coulomb model in real-time. Geophys J Int 188(2):583–599
4. Chan CH, Stein RS (2009) Stress evolution following the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake: consequences for afterslip, relaxation, aftershocks and departures from Omori decay. Geophys J Int 177(1):179–192
5. Chan CH, Ma KF, Shyu JBH, Lee YT, Wang YJ, Gao JC et al (2020) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Taiwan: TEM PSHA2020. Earthq Spectra 36(1_suppl):137–159
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献