Abstract
AbstractThe prevention of extremism experienced two developments in recent years: the securitisation of the discourse and the diversification of the involved actors. Both trends caused a certain divergence because the different stakeholders often follow different logics, methods and goals and the influence of security in many cases does not match the needs and interests of civil actors offering prevention work. Especially social work has its own ethical and methodological understanding that requires an own conceptual approach. Above all, universal or primary prevention plays an important role. The aim of the paper is not to separate social work offers in the field of extremism prevention from security politics, but rather to develop an understanding of security that better matches social work profession. In order to solve the actual divergence, a novel conceptual approach—based on the term safety—is developed and applied on preventive measures driven by social or youth work in the field of extremism prevention. The paper develops the outlines of such a concept and various proper methods. In the same time, it reminds of concepts like social cohesion or resilience that also play a role in the discourse about extremism prevention. The paper describes the safety concept by distinguishing it from these related terms.
Funder
FH Salzburg - University of Applied Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Armborst A, Biene J, Coester M, Greuel F, Milbrandt B, Nehlsen I (2018) Evaluation in der Radikalisierungsprävention. Ansätze und Kontroversen. PRIF Report 11/2018. Frankfurt a.M.: Leibniz-Institut Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung.
2. Benjamin S, Gearon L, Kuusisto A, Koirikivi P (2021) The threshold of adversity: resilience and the prevention of extremism through education. Nordic Stud Educ 41(3):201–218. https://doi.org/10.23865/nse.v41.2593
3. Bergold J, Thomas S (2012) Partizipative Forschungsmethoden. Ein methodischer Ansatz in Bewegung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 13, Heft 1. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.1.1801.
4. Berner H, Rosenlechner-Urbanek D, Mouses R (2020) Auf dem Weg zu einem machtsensiblen Dritten Raum. Erkenntnisse aus dem partizipativen Aktionsforschungsprojekt PAGES. Neue Praxis. Sonderheft 16, Partizipative Forschung in der Sozialen Arbeit:118–129
5. Bonacker T (2021) Situierte Sicherheit. Für einen methodologischen Situationismus in den Critical Security Studies. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen. 28. Jg. (2021) Heft 1:5–34. https://doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2021-1-5.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献