Abstract
AbstractStationary retailers may introduce new technologies, such as augmented reality, to provide product information and recommendations and thus improve shopping experience. Examples of such augmented reality applications are magic mirrors that enable virtual try-on and may induce cross-buying intention. Based on an experimental scenario and the corresponding results from 301 questionnaires, we find that magic mirrors positively impact consumers’ cross-buying intention. Cross-buying behavior depends particularly on price attractiveness and the aesthetic appeal of the products. Further, men place less emphasis on price attractiveness when considering cross-buying options than women. Whereas magic mirrors reduce the relationship between perceived product benefits and cross-buying behavior, the technology increases the positive effect of perceived convenience on consumers’ buying behavior. Magic mirrors, thus, improve convenience but hinder the perception of product benefits – these are better communicated by sales assistants. Magic mirrors may only partly replace sales staff, but retailers can combine both to serve consumers better.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Human-Computer Interaction,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference94 articles.
1. Abrar, K. (2018). Impact of augmented reality on Consumer Purchase Intention with the Mediating role of customer brand Engagement: moderating role of interactivity in Online Shopping. Bahria University Journal of Management & Technology, 1(2), 64–80.
2. Akçura, M. T., & Srinivasan, K. (2005). Research note: customer intimacy and Cross-Selling Strategy. Management Science, 51(6), 1007–1012. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0390
3. Aurier, P., & N’Goala, G. (2010). The differing and mediating roles of trust and relationship commitment in service relationship maintenance and development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(3), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0163-z
4. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
5. Balachander, S., Ghosh, B., & Stock, A. (2009). Why Bundle Discounts can be a profitable alternative to competing on price promotions. Marketing Science, 29(4), 624–638. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1090.0540
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献