Abstract
AbstractCuriosity and interest are at the core of human inquiry. However, controversies remain about how best to conceptualize these constructs. I propose to derive definitions by attending to the common core of typical usages of the two terms. Using this approach, curiosity can be defined as a psychological state that includes three components: recognition of an information gap, anticipation that it may be possible to close it, and an intrinsically motivated desire to do so. Interest can be more broadly defined as intrinsically motivated engagement with any specific object, content, or activity. The two definitions imply that curiosity is a special case of interest. Furthermore, I propose to use the state-trait distinction to distinguish between momentary and enduring forms of both curiosity and interest, which makes it possible to treat state versus trait curiosity and interest in conceptually parallel ways. To make further progress in understanding the two constructs, research is needed that investigates their affective dynamics and their generalizability across age-related and socio-cultural contexts.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Reference29 articles.
1. Ainley, M. (2019). Curiosity and interest: Emergence and divergence. Educational Psychology Review, 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09495-z.
2. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
3. Brun, G., Doğuoğlu, U., & Kuenzle, D. (Eds.). (2008). Epistemology and emotions. Aldershot: Ashgate.
4. Buss, A., & Plomin, R. (1984). Temperament: Early developing personality traits. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
5. Deary, I. J. (2009). The trait approach to personality. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 89–109). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596544.009.
Cited by
50 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献