1. Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Reading next—a vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: a report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
2. Braasch, J., Goldman, S. R., & Wiley, J. (2013). The influences of text and reader characteristics on learning from refutations in science texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 15, 561–568.
3. Connor, C. M., Alberto, P. A., Compton, D. L., & O’Connor, R. E. (2014a). Improving reading outcomes for students with or at risk for reading disabilities: a synthesis of the contributions from the Institute of Education Sciences research centers (NCSER 2014–3000). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
4. Connor, C. M., Phillips, B. M., Kaschak, M., Apel, K., Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., et al. (2014b). Comprehension tools for teachers: reading for understanding from pre-kindergarten through fourth grade. Educational Psychology Review. doi:s 10.1007/s10648-014-9267-1 .
5. Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325.