Abstract
AbstractThe academic literature on management consulting raises many questions about the ethics of management consulting. The uncertain, emergent, and often socially constructed nature of management consultancy knowledge limits the scope both for regulating the industry in the manner of the established professions, and for evaluating management consultants’ work objectively. The character of management consultants is therefore a central issue in how far clients and other stakeholders can trust them. This paper considers three questions, using Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics as a guide. These are, first, ‘What is the function of a management consultant?’, second, ‘How should a management consultant act in order to be a good management consultant?’, and third, ‘Where does the boundary lie between the ethical responsibilities of the management consultant and those of the client and other stakeholders?’ Aristotelian virtue ethics are valuable in answering these questions. Their focus on character is well suited to the distinct ethical problems of management consulting. Aristotle’s overarching concern with human flourishing, and an ethically balanced approach towards benefiting from the good things to which a virtuous person may aspire, has more promise as an influence on consultants’ behaviour than the lists of prohibitions that typify codes of ethical practice in the industry. Aristotle’s call for leaders to habituate their people to ethical behaviour should be heard by the leaders of management consultancy firms. In accordance with Aristotle’s philosophy, this paper proposes a positive target at which management consultants can aim in shooting for ethical practice.
Funder
Queen Mary University of London
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Reference69 articles.
1. Ackrill, J.L. (1974), “Aristotle on Eudaimonia”, Dawes Hicks lecture on philosophy, available from www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/pubs/proc/files/60p339.pdf?_ga=2.137930483.250982088.1558022202-1148893669.1557328753, accessed on 16 November 2019.
2. Allen, J., and D. Davis. 1993. Assessing some determinant effects of ethical consulting behaviour: The case of personal and professional values. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (6): 449–458.
3. Alvesson, M. 2000. Social identity and the problem of loyalty in knowledge-intensive companies. Journal of Management Studies 37 (8): 1101–1123.
4. Alvesson, M., and A.W. Johansson. 2002. Professionalism and politics in management consultancy work. In Critical consulting: New perspectives on the management advice industry, ed. T. Clark and R. Fincham, 228–246. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
5. Alvesson, M., and D. Kärreman. 2004. Interfaces of control: Technocratic and socio-ideological control in a global management consultancy firm. Accounting Organisations and Society 29 (2–3): 423–444.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献