Abstract
AbstractWhenrobots physically interact with the environment, compliant behaviors should be imposed to prevent damages to all entities involved in the interaction. Moreover, during physical interactions, appropriate pose controllers are usually based on the robot dynamics, in which the ill-conditioning of the joint-space inertia matrix may lead to poor performance or even instability. When the control is not precise, large interaction forces may appear due to disturbed end-effector poses, resulting in unsafe interactions. To overcome these problems, we propose a task-space admittance controller in which the inertia matrix conditioning is adapted online. To this end, the control architecture consists of an admittance controller in the outer loop, which changes the reference trajectory to the robot end-effector to achieve a desired compliant behavior; and an adaptive inertia matrix conditioning controller in the inner loop to track this trajectory and improve the closed-loop performance. We evaluated the proposed architecture on a KUKA LWR4+ robot and compared it, via rigorous statistical analyses, to an architecture in which the proposed inner motion controller was replaced by two widely used ones. The admittance controller with adaptive inertia conditioning presents better performance than with a controller based on the inverse dynamics with feedback linearization, and similar results when compared to the PID controller with gravity compensation in the inner loop.
Funder
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Artificial Intelligence,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Mechanical Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering,Software
Reference52 articles.
1. Cherubini, A., Crosnier, A., Fraisse, P., Navarro, B., Passama, R., Sorour, M.: Research on cobotics at the LIRMM IDH group. In: ICRA Workshop IC3 - Industry of the future: Collaborative, connected, cognitive, vol hal-015233, Singapore, pp 1–5. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01523305 (2017)
2. Hogan, N.: Impedance control: An approach to manipulation. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control. 107 (1), 1–7 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3140702. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/dynamicsystems/article/107/1/1/400604/Impedance-Control-An-Approach-to-Manipulation-Part
3. Kimmel, M., Hirche, S.: Active safety control for dynamic human-robot interaction. In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 4685–4691. IEEE. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7354044/ (2015)
4. Caccavale, F., Natale, C., Siciliano, B., Villani, L.: Six-DOF impedance control based on angle/axis representations. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 15(2), 289–300 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/70.760350. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/760350/
5. Caccavale, F., Chiacchio, P., Marino, A., Villani, L.: Six-DOF impedance control of dual-arm cooperative manipulators. IEEE/ ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 13(5), 576–586 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2008.2002816. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4639601/
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献