Identifying Novel Embedded Performance Validity Test Formulas Within the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: a Simulation Study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Identifying Novel Embedded Performance Validity Test Formulas Within the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: a Simulation Study

Published:2020-06-21 Issue:3 Volume:13 Page:303-315
ISSN:1938-971X
Container-title:Psychological Injury and Law
language:en
Short-container-title:Psychol. Inj. and Law

Author:

Lace John W.^ORCID,Grant Alexandra F.,Kosky Karen M.,Teague Carson L.,Lowell Kimberly T.,Gfeller Jeffrey D.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Psychiatry and Mental health

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12207-020-09382-x.pdf

Reference103 articles.

1. Abeare, C., Sabelli, A., Taylor, B., Holcomb, M., Dumitrescu, C., Kirsch, N., & Erdodi, L. (2019). The importance of demographically adjusted cutoffs: Age and education bias in raw score cutoffs within the Trail Making Test. Psychological Injury and Law, 12(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09353-x.

2. An, K. Y., Charles, J., Ali, S., Enache, A., Dhuga, J., & Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Reexamining performance validity cutoffs within the Complex Ideational Material and the Boston Naming Test–Short Form using an experimental malingering paradigm. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 41(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2018.1483488.

3. Armistead-Jehle, P. (2010). Symptom validity test performance in U.S. veterans referred for evaluation of mild TBI. Applied Neuropsychology, 17(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084280903526182.

4. Bain, K. M., & Soble, J. R. (2019). Validation of the Advanced Clinical Solutions Word Choice Test (WCT) in a mixed clinical sample: Establishing classification accuracy, sensitivity/specificity, and cutoff scores. Assessment, 26(7), 1320–1328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117725172.

5. Barhon, L. I., Batchelor, J., Meares, S., Chekaluk, E., & Shores, E. A. (2015). A comparison of the degree of effort involved in the TOMM and the ACS Word Choice Test using a dual-task paradigm. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 22(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2013.863775.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. That old dog can still hunt—Alternative cutoffs and the recognition trial improve the classification accuracy of the Rey 15-Item Test.;Professional Psychology: Research and Practice;2024-08-05

2. Using the Grooved Pegboard Test as an Embedded Validity Indicator in a Mixed Neuropsychiatric Sample with Varying Cognitive Impairment: Cross-Validation Problems;Perceptual and Motor Skills;2023-01-12

3. Take Their Word for It: The Inventory of Problems Provides Valuable Information on Both Symptom and Performance Validity;Journal of Personality Assessment;2022-08-30

4. Multivariate models provide an effective psychometric solution to the variability in classification accuracy of D-KEFS Stroop performance validity cutoffs;The Clinical Neuropsychologist;2022-08-10

5. Multivariate Models of Performance Validity: The Erdodi Index Captures the Dual Nature of Non-Credible Responding (Continuous and Categorical);Assessment;2022-06-25