Abstract
AbstractLearning to read in most alphabetic orthographies requires not only the acquisition of simple grapheme-phoneme correspondences (GPCs) but also the acquisition of context-sensitive GPCs, where surrounding letters change a grapheme’s pronunciation. We aimed to explore the use and development of simple GPCs (e.g. a ➔ /æ/) and context-sensitive GPCs (e.g. [w]a ➔ /ɔ/, as in “swan” or a[l][d] ➔ /o:/, as in “bald”) in pseudoword reading. Across three experiments, English- and German-speaking children in grades 2–4 read aloud pseudowords, where vowel graphemes had different pronunciations according to different contexts (e.g. “hact”, “wact”, “hald”). First, we found that children use context-sensitive GPCs from grade 2 onwards, even when they are not explicitly taught. Second, we used a mathematical optimisation procedure to assess whether children’s vowel responses can be described by assuming that they rely on a mix of simple and context-sensitive GPCs. While the approach works well for German adults (Schmalz et al. in Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 831–852, 2014), we found poor model fits for both German- and English-speaking children. Additional analyses using an entropy measure and data from a third experiment showed that children’s pseudoword reading responses are variable and likely affected by random noise. We found a decrease in entropy across grade and reading ability across all conditions in both languages. This suggests that GPC knowledge becomes increasingly refined across grades 2–4.
Funder
Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australian Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Education
Reference39 articles.
1. Andrews, S., & Scarratt, D. R. (1998). Rule and analogy mechanisms in reading nonwords: hough dou peapel rede gnew wirds? Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 24(4), 1052–1086. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.24.4.1052.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database. Release 2 (CD-ROM): Linguistic data consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., et al. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.3758/Bf03193014.
4. Borgwaldt, S., Hellwig, F., & de Groot, A. (2004). Word-initial entropy in five languages: Letter to sound, and sound to letter. Written Language & Literacy, 7(2), 165–184.
5. Campbell, R., & Besner, D. (1981). This and THAP - Constraints on the pronunciation of new, written words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 375–396.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献