Perceptions of the Australian research council large grants scheme: Differences between successful and unsuccessful applicants-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Perceptions of the Australian research council large grants scheme: Differences between successful and unsuccessful applicants

Published:1996-08 Issue:2 Volume:23 Page:17-36
ISSN:0311-6999
Container-title:The Australian Educational Researcher
language:en
Short-container-title:Aust. Educ. Res.

Author:

Over Ray

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF03219618.pdf

Reference20 articles.

1. Australian Research Council (1992)Advice and Instructions to Applicants for 1994 Research Grants, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.

2. Australian Research Council (1993a)Review of Grant Outcomes, No. 8: Materials and Chemical Engineering 1987–1991, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.

3. Australian Research Council (1993b)Review of Grant Outcomes, No. 10: Organic Chemistry 1987–1991, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.

4. Australian Research Council (1994)Review of Grant Outcomes, No. 12: Molecular Biology 1987–1991, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.

5. Brennan, M. (1992)Australian Research Council Newsletter, National Board of Employment, Education and Training, Canberra.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions;Higher Education;2020-10-03

2. Cognitive Distances between Evaluators and Evaluees in Research Evaluation: A Comparison between Three Informetric Methods at the Journal and Subject Category Aggregation Level;Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics;2017-08-23

3. Scientific peer review;Annual Review of Information Science and Technology;2011

4. Neue Evaluationsregime? Von der Inquisition zur Evaluation;Wissenschaft unter Beobachtung;2008