“That’s kind of like the big struggle right now is can we get PrEP?”: Facilitators and Barriers to PrEP Uptake Among Active Duty Gay and Bisexual Men
-
Published:2021-08-20
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1868-9884
-
Container-title:Sexuality Research and Social Policy
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sex Res Soc Policy
Author:
Beltran Raiza M.,Schuyler Ashley C.,Blair Cherie S.,Goldbach Jeremy T.,Castro Carl A.,Holloway Ian W.
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The US Military is experiencing a rise in HIV infections among gay and bisexual men (GBM) serving on active duty, yet little is known about this population’s uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), an evidence-based intervention for HIV prevention. This mixed methods study examines the facilitators and barriers to PrEP access and uptake among active duty GBM.
Methods
Active duty GBM were recruited using respondent-driven sampling (2017 and 2018). Participants (n = 93) answered quantitative survey questions on PrEP interest and accessibility. Another set of participants (n = 10) discussed their PrEP experiences in qualitative interviews. We conducted descriptive and bivariate analyses of quantitative data, while qualitative data were analyzed using structural and descriptive coding techniques.
Results
Approximately 71% of active duty GBM indicated interest in accessing PrEP. A greater proportion of those who disclosed (vs. did not disclose) their sexual orientation to their military doctor discussed (p < 0.001) or accessed (p = 0.017) PrEP. The following qualitative themes emerged: (1) providers’ negative views and knowledge gaps related to PrEP; (2) lack of a systems approach to PrEP access; (3) confidentiality concerns; and (4) reliance on peer networks for PrEP guidance and support.
Conclusions
Study results indicate that active duty GBM are interested in and want to discuss PrEP with their military doctors, but gaps in providers’ PrEP-related knowledge and skills, as well as mistrust in the military health care system, remain.
Policy Implications
A system-wide approach that addresses confidentiality concerns and removes procedural barriers to PrEP access is recommended to improve PrEP uptake in this population.
Funder
U.S. Department of Defense National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science),Gender Studies
Reference40 articles.
1. Anderson, P. L., Glidden, D. V, Liu, A., Buchbinder, S., Lama, J. R., Guanira, J. V., … & Montoya-Herrera, O. (2012). Emtricitabine-tenofovir concentrations and pre-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in men who have sex with men. Science Translational Medicine, 4(151), 151ra125–151ra125. 2. Ard, K. L., Edelstein, Z. R., Bolduc, P., Daskalakis, D., Gandhi, A. D., Krakower, D. S., ... & Keuroghlian, A. S. (2019). Public health detailing for human immunodeficiency virus pre-exposure prophylaxis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 68(5), 860–864. 3. Biddix, J. M., Fogel, C. I., & Perry Black, B. (2013). Comfort levels of active duty gay/bisexual male service members in the military healthcare system. Military Medicine, 178(12), 1335–1340. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00044 4. Blaylock, J. M., Hakre, S., Decker, C. F., Wilson, B., Bianchi, E., Michael, N., ... & Scott, P. T. (2018a). HIV PrEP in the Military: Experience at a Tertiary Care Military Medical Center. Military Medicine, 183(2233), 445–449. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usx143 5. Blaylock, J. M., Hakre, S., Okulicz, J. F., Garges, E., Wilson, K., Lay, J., … & Scott, P. T. (2018b). HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis in the U.S. Military Services — 2014–2016. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67(20), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6720a1
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|