Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science

Author:

Grant SeanORCID,Wendt Kathleen E.,Leadbeater Bonnie J.,Supplee Lauren H.,Mayo-Wilson Evan,Gardner Frances,Bradshaw Catherine P.

Abstract

AbstractThe field of prevention science aims to understand societal problems, identify effective interventions, and translate scientific evidence into policy and practice. There is growing interest among prevention scientists in the potential for transparency, openness, and reproducibility to facilitate this mission by providing opportunities to align scientific practice with scientific ideals, accelerate scientific discovery, and broaden access to scientific knowledge. The overarching goal of this manuscript is to serve as a primer introducing and providing an overview of open science for prevention researchers. In this paper, we discuss factors motivating interest in transparency and reproducibility, research practices associated with open science, and stakeholders engaged in and impacted by open science reform efforts. In addition, we discuss how and why different types of prevention research could incorporate open science practices, as well as ways that prevention science tools and methods could be leveraged to advance the wider open science movement. To promote further discussion, we conclude with potential reservations and challenges for the field of prevention science to address as it transitions to greater transparency, openness, and reproducibility. Throughout, we identify activities that aim to strengthen the reliability and efficiency of prevention science, facilitate access to its products and outputs, and promote collaborative and inclusive participation in research activities. By embracing principles of transparency, openness, and reproducibility, prevention science can better achieve its mission to advance evidence-based solutions to promote individual and collective well-being.

Funder

Arnold Ventures

National Science Foundation

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference215 articles.

1. Academy of Medical Sciences. (2015). Reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research: Improving research practice. London, UK: Academy of Medical Sciences.

2. Administration for Children and Families. (2014). Evaluation Policy

3. Cooperative Research or Demonstration Projects (79 FR 51574). Retrieved 19 January 2022, from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2014/08/29/2014-20616/evaluation-policy-cooperative-research-ordemonstration-projects

4. Altman, D. G., Furberg, C. D., Grimshaw, J. M., & Shanahan, D. R. (2014). Linked publications from a single trial: A thread of evidence. Trials, 15, 369. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-369

5. Anderson, M. S., Martinson, B. C., & Vries, R. D. (2016). Normative Dissonance in Science: Results from a National Survey of U.S. Scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.3

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3