Abstract
AbstractThe field of prevention science aims to understand societal problems, identify effective interventions, and translate scientific evidence into policy and practice. There is growing interest among prevention scientists in the potential for transparency, openness, and reproducibility to facilitate this mission by providing opportunities to align scientific practice with scientific ideals, accelerate scientific discovery, and broaden access to scientific knowledge. The overarching goal of this manuscript is to serve as a primer introducing and providing an overview of open science for prevention researchers. In this paper, we discuss factors motivating interest in transparency and reproducibility, research practices associated with open science, and stakeholders engaged in and impacted by open science reform efforts. In addition, we discuss how and why different types of prevention research could incorporate open science practices, as well as ways that prevention science tools and methods could be leveraged to advance the wider open science movement. To promote further discussion, we conclude with potential reservations and challenges for the field of prevention science to address as it transitions to greater transparency, openness, and reproducibility. Throughout, we identify activities that aim to strengthen the reliability and efficiency of prevention science, facilitate access to its products and outputs, and promote collaborative and inclusive participation in research activities. By embracing principles of transparency, openness, and reproducibility, prevention science can better achieve its mission to advance evidence-based solutions to promote individual and collective well-being.
Funder
Arnold Ventures
National Science Foundation
National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference215 articles.
1. Academy of Medical Sciences. (2015). Reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research: Improving research practice. London, UK: Academy of Medical Sciences.
2. Administration for Children and Families. (2014). Evaluation Policy
3. Cooperative Research or Demonstration Projects (79 FR 51574). Retrieved 19 January 2022, from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2014/08/29/2014-20616/evaluation-policy-cooperative-research-ordemonstration-projects
4. Altman, D. G., Furberg, C. D., Grimshaw, J. M., & Shanahan, D. R. (2014). Linked publications from a single trial: A thread of evidence. Trials, 15, 369. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-369
5. Anderson, M. S., Martinson, B. C., & Vries, R. D. (2016). Normative Dissonance in Science: Results from a National Survey of U.S. Scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.3
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献