Abstract
The recently released draft South African Ethics in Health Research Guidelines: Principles, Processes and Structures (Draft Guidelines) by the National Health Research Ethics Council recognize open data and provide guiding principles for this in the context of health research in South Africa. While its inclusion is a positive development, there is room for improvement. Although the Draft Guidelines leverage the Draft National Policy on Data and Cloud, it lacks incorporation of other relevant government policies, notably the Draft National Open Science Policy, and fails to sufficiently detail the principles of open science and open access. This limited scope and lack of comprehensive definition and detailed guidance present challenges for researchers in conducting ethical and responsible health research in South Africa. It constrains the Draft Guidelines from fully aligning with national imperatives and from fostering African-centric approaches. To address these issues, it is recommended that the Draft Guidelines integrate broader policies and principles, enhance clarity through comprehensive definitions, provide detailed guidance on open access, and promote African-centric approaches. Implementing these solutions will strengthen the Draft Guidelines, aligning them with national visions of open science, and thereby harnessing the full potential of South Africa’s diverse scientific community in advancing health research.
Funder
National Institutes of Health
Reference88 articles.
1. COVID-19: impact on the HIV and Tuberculosis response, service delivery, and research in South Africa;Abdool Karim;Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep.,2022
2. HIV infection and tuberculosis in South Africa: an urgent need to escalate the public health response;Abdool Karim;Lancet,2009
3. Human genetics and genomics in South Africa: ethical, legal and social Implications10.17159/assaf.2018/00332018
4. African open science platform – Part 1: landscape study2019
5. POPIA Code of conduct for research2023