Abstract
AbstractCo-production affords an intervention’s target population the opportunity to participate in intervention theory decision-making during the development process. This addresses the over-reliance on developing interventions through academic theories which can be devoid of contextual understanding and result in challenges to implementing school-based health programmes. There is an emergent empirical literature on co-producing school-based health interventions, but an understanding of appropriate theoretical types and processes and stakeholders’ experiences is lacking. Through the conduct of a systematic review, this study seeks to understand the types and underlying theories and processes for co-production in school-based health interventions with students aged 11–16. A thematic synthesis explored stakeholders’ experiences of the different types of co-production. A systematic search of five electronic bibliographic databases, citation tracking of included studies, and consultation with an expert international panel were employed. Of 27,433 unique papers, 30 papers representing 22 studies were retained to describe types, and 23 papers of 18 studies used to synthesise stakeholders’ experiences. Three types were identified: external, individual-level, and system-level capacity-building. Whilst this review showed variability in co-production types, stakeholders involved and processes, shared functions were identified. Students’, school staff, facilitators’ and researchers’ experiences in terms of acceptability, feasibility and undertaking decision-making are discussed. Recommendations for conceptualising and reporting co-production and process evaluations of co-produced school-based health interventions are highlighted.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
Medical Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference69 articles.
1. Baum, F. (2015). The new public health (4th ed.). Victoria: Oxford University Press.
2. **Bell, P. (2014). A transformative, participatory approach for social-emotional focused urban school reform. Louisiana: Tulane University.
3. **Bell, P., Larrazolo, H., & Nastasi, B. (2017). Promoting universal psychological well-being in an urban U.S. public school using a culture-specific, participatory action research approach to consultation. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology, 5, 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2016.1276815.
4. **Bond, L., Glover, S., Godfery, C., Bulter, H., & Patton, G. C. (2001). Building capacity for system-level changes in schools: Lessons from the gatehouse project. Health Education & Behavior, 28, 368–383.
5. Bonell, C., Allen, E., Warren, E., McGowan, J., Bevilacqua, L., Jamal, F., et al. (2018). Effects of the learning together intervention on bullying and aggression in English secondary schools (INCLUSIVE): A cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 392, 2452–2464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31782-3.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献