Abstract
AbstractUniversity mathematics studies are known for high dropout especially in the freshmen year. This dropout is often traced back to the excessive demands freshmen have to face. Research aimed at identifying students’ characteristics that enable them to overcome the demands, for example through cognitive abilities, motivational constructs or self-beliefs. In this paper, we take a different perspective and suggest to include a construct that has not been considered in university mathematics education so far: mathematical resilience. Mathematical resilience is a well-established construct in school education to describe students’ attitude in handling everyday educational challenges like setbacks or frustration. We aim to transfer the construct to university mathematics education. Based on a literature review, we argue that the weekly mathematics assignments (i.e., compulsory exercises) pose a major emotional challenge for freshmen as they require advanced mathematical skills like proving, which students only scarcely learn at school. Failing at those mathematics exercises can lead to lasting frustration and, eventually, dropout. Mathematical resilience may thus be a relevant construct to consider when investigating dropout. We present a novel instrument measuring mathematical resilience against mathematics exercises. Findings of an empirical study with 424 mathematics freshmen confirm that mathematics assignments are in fact viewed as the most frustrating everyday challenge. Moreover, the data provide evidence on the validity and reliability of the novel instrument. The results show that mathematical resilience and the corresponding instrument contribute to research on academic success and failure of mathematics freshmen considering the specific conditions of university mathematics studies.
Funder
IPN – Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik an der Universität Kiel
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Mathematics
Reference107 articles.
1. Ableitinger, C. (2012). Typische Teilprozesse beim Lösen hochschulmathematischer Aufgaben: Kategorienbildung und Ankerbeispiele. Journal für Mathematikdidaktik, 33, 87–111.
2. AERA, APA, & NCME (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: American Educational Research Association.
3. Alcock, L., Attridge, N., Kenny, S., & Inglis, M. (2014). Achievement and behaviour in undergraduate mathematics: personality is a better predictor than gender. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2013.874094.
4. Alsina, C. (2006). Why the professor must be a stimulating teacher. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: an ICMI study (pp. 3–12). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
5. Andrà, C., Magnano, G., & Morselli, F. (2011). Drop-out undergraduate students in mathematics: an exploratory study. Current State of Research on Mathematical Beliefs, XVII, 13–22.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献