Abstract
AbstractA more holistic understanding of land use and land cover (LULC) will help minimise trade-offs and maximise synergies, and lead to improved future land use management strategies for the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, current assessments of future LULC changes rarely focus on the multiple demands for goods and services, which are related to the synergies and trade-offs between SDGs and their targets. In this study, the land system (combinations of land cover and land use intensity) evolution trajectories of the Luanhe River Basin (LRB), China, and major challenges that the LRB may face in 2030, were explored by applying the CLUMondo and InVEST models. The results indicate that the LRB is likely to experience agricultural intensification and urban growth under all four scenarios that were explored. The cropland intensity and the urban growth rate were much higher under the historical trend (Trend) scenario compared to those with more planning interventions (Expansion, Sustainability, and Conservation scenarios). Unless the forest area and biodiversity conservation targets are implemented (Conservation scenario), the forest areas are projected to decrease by 2030. The results indicate that water scarcity in the LRB is likely to increase under all scenarios, and the carbon storage will increase under the Conservation scenario but decrease under all other scenarios by 2030. Our methodological framework and findings can guide regional sustainable development in the LRB and other large river basins in China, and will be valuable for policy and planning purposes to the pursuance of SDGs at the sub-national scale.
Funder
Natural Environment Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Sociology and Political Science,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science),Global and Planetary Change
Reference144 articles.
1. Ahmad E, Stern N, Xie C (2020) From rescue to recovery: towards a sustainable transition for China after the COVID-19 pandemic. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science
2. Alcamo J, Schaldach R (2006) LandShift: global modelling to assess land use change. In: Tochtermann K, Scharl A (eds) Managing environmental knowledge. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, pp 223–230
3. Barnaud C, Corbera E, Muradian R, Salliou N, Sirami C, Vialatte A, Choisis J-P, Dendoncker N, Mathevet R, Moreau C (2018) Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action. Ecol Soc 23(1):1–14
4. Benayas JMR, Bullock JM (2012) Restoration of biodiversity and ecosystem services on agricultural land. Ecosystems 15(6):883–899
5. Bi W, Weng B, Yuan Z, Ye M, Zhang C, Zhao Y, Yan D, Xu T (2018) Evolution characteristics of surface water quality due to climate change and LUCC under scenario simulations: a case study in the Luanhe River Basin. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(8):1724