Validation and Measurement Invariance of the German and Spanish Gender Bias Scale for Women Leaders
-
Published:2024-05-02
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0889-3268
-
Container-title:Journal of Business and Psychology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Bus Psychol
Author:
Algner MonaORCID, Fay DorisORCID, Lorenz TimoORCID
Abstract
AbstractGender bias still appears to contribute significantly to the gender disparity observed in upper leadership positions. The present study presents the translation, modification, and validation of the Gender Bias Scale for Women Leaders (GBSWL, Diehl et al., 2020) into German and Spanish. Using data from four samples of full-time employed women from Germany and Spain with and without leadership responsibility (N = 870), we conducted confirmatory factor analyses to establish factorial validity, tested measurement invariance across the different job levels and countries, and tested construct validity. Our results indicate that the original factor structure does not hold in Germany and Spain. Therefore, utilizing the German leader sample as a construction sample, we modified the factor structure and validated the modified version using the remaining three samples. The modified version demonstrated good model fit, had metric measurement invariance across all samples, and resulted in a correlational pattern consistent with theory and the original study. Overall, results suggest that the German and Spanish versions of the GBSWL are reliable and valid instruments that scholars and practitioners can use to advance theory, research, and human resource practice in Germany and Spain.
Funder
Universität Potsdam
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference86 articles.
1. Aguinis, H., Villamor, I., & Ramani, R. S. (2021). MTurk research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Management, 47(4), 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320969787 2. Allen, M. S., Iliescu, D., & Greiff, S. (2022). Single item measures in psychological science. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000699 3. Badura, K. L., Grijalva, E., Newman, D. A., Yan, T. T., & Jeon, G. (2018). Gender and leadership emergence: A meta-analysis and explanatory model. Personnel Psychology, 71(3), 335–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12266 4. Brändle, T., Kalweit, R., Koch, A., Scheu, T., Schlachter-Voll, M., & Wiemann, J. S. (2023). Zweiter Bericht der Bundesregierung zur Wirksamkeit des Gesetzes zur Förderung der Entgelttransparenz zwischen Frauen und Männern sowie zum Stand der Umsetzung des Entgeltgleichheitsgebots in Betrieben mit weniger als 200 Beschäftigten. Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. Retrieved March 3, 2024, from https://www.bmfsfj.de/resource/blob/229484/7c1deeee794163514c0221663af940d2/zweiter-bericht-entgelttransparenzgesetz-data.pdf 5. Camman, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire. (Unpublished manuscript).
|
|