Abstract
AbstractInvolving students in laboratory and inquiry-based activities can help them understand the concepts of physics. However the learning process should not only focus on the concepts. Moreover, the advantages of using virtual or physical labs are still under examination. The purpose of this study is to analyse which of the two modes (virtual or physical) is the most effective for high-school students, in terms of conceptual understanding and attitudes. The criteria for this comparison are (a) the contribution of these two modes to the improvement of conceptual understanding and (b) the students’ attitudes towards both modes of laboratory. The participants were high-school students of 3rd grade in two different groups. For the purpose of the study, four educational scenarios were created: two in the field of Mechanics and two in that of Electricity. The study revealed no statistically significant difference regarding students’ experimenting in either lab mode. Moreover, students’ attitudes towards both virtual and physical labs were similarly positive. We assume that these results may contribute to a broader perspective on choosing the lab mode when designing activities, given the fact that both the understanding and attitudes of the students are similar in the cases examined. Thus, the final choice of modality should be based on other factors, such as the adequacy of equipment, the educational conditions (e.g. distance education) and the specific learning goals set by the teacher.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Engineering,Education
Reference53 articles.
1. Bajpai, M. (2013). Developing concepts in physics through virtual lab experiment: An effectiveness study. TechnoLearn: An International Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), 43–50.
2. Chen, S., Chang, W. H., Lai, C. H., & Tsai, C. Y. (2014). A comparison of students’ approaches to inquiry, conceptual learning, and attitudes in simulation-based and microcomputer-based laboratories. Science Education, 98(5), 905–935. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21126
3. Conlin, L. D., Kuo, E., & Hallinen, N. R. (2019). How null results can be significant for physics education research. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 020104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVPHYSEDUCRES.15.020104/FIGURES/1/MEDIUM
4. Corter, J. E., Esche, S. K., Chassapis, C., Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2011). Process and learning outcomes from remotely-operated, simulated, and hands-on student laboratories. Computers and Education, 57(3), 2054–2067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.009
5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.