Author:
van de Graaf Floyd W.,Eryigit Özgür,Lange Johan F.
Abstract
AbstractThe availability of intraoperative multimedia recording is increasing. Considering the growing call for physicians’ accountability, it is inevitable that multimedia will play an important role in aiding quality control by improving the adequacy of operative reporting. However, the perspectives of medical professionals on this matter are poorly known. In this cross-disciplinary survey, we aimed to investigate the current viewpoints concerning the use of multimedia recording in the operating room. We conducted an electronic survey among all affiliated members of the Association of Surgeons of the Netherlands, the Dutch Urological Association and the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology containing questions regarding current use of intraoperative recording and the level of likelihood or objection for certain scenarios. The response rate was 27.8%. The survey encompasses 370 (54.5%) surgeons, 71 (10.5%) urologists, 80 (11.8%) gynecologists, and 158 (23.3%) residents in training. 52.4% of respondents feel that the currently used operative report is insufficient for future quality requirements. 58.5% think it is unlikely they would behave differently during surgery when intra-operative video recording is applied. 82.8% think it is unlikely that their surgical methods would be altered. 63.8% of respondents preferred only video registration when intraoperative recording is implemented. The majority of respondents agree that the current method of operative reporting is insufficient for future quality requirements. There is support for intraoperative video recording, however, legal transparency is needed before either intraoperative video or audio recording could be implemented to protect not only the patients, but also the healthcare providers.
Funder
University Medical Center Rotterdam
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Plaisier PW, Pauwels MM, Lange JF (2001) Quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operation notes, video or photo print? HPB 3(3):197–199
2. Evidence based guideline (2016) Diagnosis and treatment of cholelithiasis. https://heelkunde.nl/sites/heelkunde.nl/files/richtlijnen-definitief/Richtlijn_Galsteenlijden_09032016.pdf
3. Sanford DE, Strasberg SM (2014) A simple effective method for generation of a permanent record of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by intraoperative “doublet” photography. J Am Coll Surg 218(2):170–178
4. Wauben LS, van Grevenstein WM, Goossens RH, van der Meulen FH, Lange JF (2011) Operative notes do not reflect reality in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98(10):1431–1436
5. van de Graaf FW, Lange MM, Menon AG, O’Mahoney PR, Milsom JW, Lange JF (2016) Imaging for quality control: comparison of systematic video recording to the operative note in colorectal cancer surgery. A pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol 23:798–803
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献