Abstract
AbstractIt is widely accepted that young people’s lives are more complex than ever before and this complexity is making classroom life difficult for many. In response, around 30,000 Australian young people are choosing home education (Moir & English, 2022). While many consider home educators to be ideologically inflexible and religiously fundamental, this stereotype does not reflect the Australian home education movement (Moir & English, 2022; English, 2021a, 2021b). Indeed, many parents are making a “choice without markets” (Aurini & Davis, 2005), attempting to address the top-down, centralised and inflexible curriculum increasingly found in schools (English, 2021a, 2021b, Van Galen, 1991). This paper explores the democratic potential of unschooling, a widely adopted, but frequently misunderstood, approach to home education that has, at its heart, a democratic educational approach rooted in agency (Romero, 2018; Riley, 2021). Unschooling moves beyond civics and citizenship to a lived experience of democracy for young people. Through an analysis of extant home education literature as well as data from the inquiry into homeschooling from the New South Wales upper house (Select Committee into Home Schooling, 2014) we propose that the greatest threat to democracy for change in curriculum is too much regulatory control over home education while the greatest benefit of unschooling is its emphasis on participatory democracy and agency for young people.
Funder
Queensland University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Appel, M. (2020). Performativity and the demise of the teaching profession: The need for rebalancing in Australia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3), 301–315.
2. Apple, M. W. (2000). Away with all teachers: The cultural politics of home schooling. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 10(1), 61–80.
3. Aurini, J., & Davies, S. (2005). Choice without markets: Homeschooling in the context of private education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(4), 461–474.
4. Australian Broadcasting Corporation, ABC. (2005). Closed school goes to Supreme Court. Retrieved April 21, 2023, from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2005-08-26/closed-school-goes-to-supreme-court/2089338?utm_campaign=abc_news_web&utm_content=link&utm_medium=content_shared&utm_source=abc_news_web
5. Barratt-Peacock, J. (2003). Australian home education: A model. Evaluation & Research in Education, 17(2–3), 101–111.