Abstract
AbstractThe optimal treatment of Type-B aortic dissection (AD) is still a subject of debate, with up to 50% of the cases developing late-term complications requiring invasive intervention. A better understanding of the patient-specific haemodynamic features of AD can provide useful insights on disease progression and support clinical management. In this work, a novel in vitro and in silico framework to perform personalised studies of AD, informed by non-invasive clinical data, is presented. A Type-B AD was investigated in silico using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and in vitro by means of a state-of-the-art mock circulatory loop and particle image velocimetry (PIV). Both models not only reproduced the anatomical features of the patient, but also imposed physiologically-accurate and personalised boundary conditions. Experimental flow rate and pressure waveforms, as well as detailed velocity fields acquired via PIV, are extensively compared against numerical predictions at different locations in the aorta, showing excellent agreement. This work demonstrates how experimental and numerical tools can be developed in synergy to accurately reproduce patient-specific AD blood flow. The combined platform presented herein constitutes a powerful tool for advanced haemodynamic studies for a range of vascular conditions, allowing not only the validation of CFD models, but also clinical decision support, surgical planning as well as medical device innovation.
Funder
Wellcome Trust
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
British Heart Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Alimohammadi, M., J. M. Sherwood, M. Karimpour, O. Agu, S. Balabani, and V. Díaz-Zuccarini. Aortic dissection simulation models for clinical support: fluid-structure interaction vs rigid wall models. Biomed. Eng. 14:34, 2015.
2. Bäumler, K., V. Vedula, A. M. Sailer, J. Seo, P. Chiu, G. Mistelbauer, F. P. Chan, M. P. Fischbein, A. L. Marsden, and D. Fleischmann. Fluid—structure interaction simulations of patient—specific aortic dissection. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2020.
3. Birjiniuk, J., J. N. Oshinski, D. N. Ku, and R. K. Veeraswamy. Endograft exclusion of the false lumen restores local hemodynamics in a model of type B aortic dissection. J. Vasc. Surg. 71:2108–2118, 2020.
4. Bonfanti, M., S. Balabani, M. Alimohammadi, O. Agu, S. Homer-vanniasinkam, and V. Díaz-zuccarini. A simplified method to account for wall motion in patient-specific blood flow simulations of aortic dissection: comparison with fluid-structure interaction. Med. Eng. Phys. 58:72–79, 2018.
5. Bonfanti, M., S. Balabani, J. P. Greenwood, S. Puppala, S. Homer-Vanniasinkam, and V. Díaz-Zuccarini. Computational tools for clinical support: a multi-scale compliant model for haemodynamic simulations in an aortic dissection based on multi-modal imaging data. J. R. Soc. Interface 14:20170632, 2017.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献