Abstract
AbstractThis article considers science teaching and learning as may be understood through the integration of indigenous artefacts into physics curriculum in Zimbabwean schools. It comments significance of and elaborates on the issues raised in Nadaraj Govender and Edson Mudzamiri’s paper entitled: Incorporating indigenous artefacts in developing an integrated indigenous-pedagogical model in high school physics curriculum: views of elders, teachers and learners. At the outset, I examine the study’s conceptualisation of the terms indigenous knowledge (IK) and school science. Then, I offer an alternative view on the findings in light of the ubuntu theoretical framework, as used in other studies. The article foregrounds theoretical and methodological arguments put forward by Govender and Mudzamiri for the incorporation of IK artefacts with physics education in schools. After that, I analyse the applicability of the article’s proposed integrated indigenous physics pedagogical model in the school curriculum. The paper ends with the contention that school science should be taught as a cultural way of knowing rather mere facts divorced from learners’ culture.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Integrating Western and aboriginal sciences: Cross-cultural science teaching. Research in Science Education, 31, 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200103)852<1080:AIDCSE50>3.0C02-1.
2. Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. Teachers College Press.
3. Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199903)36:3<269::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-T.
4. Battiste, M. (2004). Respecting postcolonial standards of indigenous knowledge: Toward “a shared and sustainable future.” The Journal of Aboriginal Economic Development, 4(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1003/200402.
5. Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. Sage.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献