1. Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–64). NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
2. Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1315–1346. doi: 10.1080/09500690600621100 .
3. Fleer, M. (2008). Using digital video observations and computer technologies in a cultural–historical approach. In M. Hedegaard, M. Fleer, J. Bang, & P. Hviid (Eds.), Studying children: A cultural–historical approach (pp. 104–117). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
4. Gonzalez Rey, F. (2009). Historical relevance of Vygotsky’s work: Its significance for a new approach to the problem of subjectivity in psychology. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 11, 59–73.
5. Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79–96). New York: Cambridge University Press.