Use and misuse of metrics in research evaluation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Use and misuse of metrics in research evaluation

Published:1997-06 Issue:2 Volume:3 Page:109-120
ISSN:1353-3452
Container-title:Science and Engineering Ethics
language:en
Short-container-title:SCI ENG ETHICS

Author:

Kostoff Ronald N.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11948-997-0002-x.pdf

Reference14 articles.

1. Research Performance Indicators Survey (1993), National Board of Employment, Education and Training, Commissioned Report No. 21 (January), Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia,.

2. Narin, F., Olivastro, D., & Stevens, K. A. (1994) Bibliometrics — Theory, Practice, and Problems, Evaluation Review 18:1 (February).

3. King, J. (1987) “A Review of Bibliometric and Other Science Indicators and Their Role in Research Evaluation”, Journal of Information Science 13.

4. MacRoberts, M. H. & MacRoberts, B. R. (1996) Problems of Citation Analysis, Scientometrics, 36:3 (July–August): 435–444.

5. U. S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment;OTA,1986

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. From the Soviet Union to the Russian Federation: publication activity dynamics along the evolution of national science policies;Scientometrics;2023-10-17

2. Who’s reading who?;Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes;2022-12-01

3. Measuring research ‘impact’ for academic promotion: issues from the literature;Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management;2013-08

4. Forecasting for strengthening technological development;Ingeniería e Investigación;2009-09-01

5. Database tomography for information retrieval;Journal of Information Science;1997-08