Author:
Palumbo D.,De Finis R.,Di Carolo F.,Vasco-Olmo J.,Diaz F. A.,Galietti U.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Stress Intensity Factor (SIF) is used to describe the stress state and the mechanical behaviour of a material in the presence of cracks. SIF can be experimentally assessed using contactless techniques such as Thermoelastic Stress Analysis (TSA). The classic TSA theory concerns the relationship between temperature and stress variations and was successfully applied to fracture mechanics for SIF evaluation and crack tip location. This theory is no longer valid for some materials, such as titanium and aluminium, where the temperature variations also depend on the mean stress.
Objective
The objective of this work was to present a new thermoelastic equation that includes the mean stress dependence to investigate the thermoelastic effect in the proximity of crack tips on titanium.
Methods
Westergaard’s equations and Williams’s series expansion were employed in order to express the thermoelastic signal, including the second-order effect. Tests have been carried out to investigate the differences in SIF evaluation between the proposed approach and the classical one.
Results
A first qualitative evaluation of the importance of considering second-order effects in the thermoelastic signal in proximity of the crack tip in two loading conditions at two different loading ratios, R = 0.1 and R = 0.5, consisted of comparing the experimental signal and synthetic TSA maps. Moreover, the SIF, evaluated with the proposed and classical approaches, was compared with values from the ASTM standard formulas.
Conclusions
The new formulation demonstrates its improved capability for describing the stress distribution in the proximity of the crack tip. The effect of the correction cannot be neglected in either Williams’s or Westergaard’s model.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,Aerospace Engineering
Reference46 articles.
1. Yates JR, Zanganeh M (2010) Quantifying crack tip displacement fields with DIC. Eng Fract Mech 77(11):2063–2076
2. Vasco-Olmo JM, James MN, Christoper CJ, Patterson EA (2016) Assessment of crack tip plastic zone size and shape and its influence on crack tip shielding. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 39:969–981
3. Nurse AD, Patterson EA (1990) Photoelastic determination of stress intensity factors for edge cracks under mixed-mode loading. In Proceedings 9th Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Copenhagen, 2, pp. 948–957
4. Stanley P (1997) Applications and potential of thermoelastic stress analysis. J Mater Process Tech 64:359–370
5. Lesniak J, Bazile D, Boyce B, Zichel M, Cramer K, Weich C (1997) Stress intensity measurement via intensity focal plane array. In Nontraditional Methods of Sensing Stress, Strain, and Damage in materials and Structures, ed. Lucas G, Stubbs D, (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International 208–220
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献