Abstract
Abstract
Context
Proximity of landcover elements to each other will enable or constrain fire spread. Assessments of potential fire propagation across landscapes typically involve empirical or simulation models that estimate probabilities based on complex interactions among biotic and abiotic controls.
Objectives
We developed a metric of landscape fire exposure based solely on a grid cell’s proximity to nearby hazardous fuel capable of transmitting fire to its location. To evaluate accuracy of this new metric, we asked: Do burned areas occur preferentially in locations with high exposure?
Methods
We mapped exposure to hazardous fuels in Alberta, Canada using a neighbourhood analysis. Correspondence between exposure and 2331 fires that burned 2,606,387 ha following our 2007 assessment was evaluated and exposure changes between 2007 and 2019 were assessed.
Results
In all eleven ecological units analysed, burned area surpluses occurred where exposure was ≥ 60% and corresponding deficits occurred where exposure was < 40%. In seven ecological units, the majority of burned areas had pre-fire exposure ≥ 80%. Between 2007 and 2019, land area with exposure ≥ 80% increased by almost a third.
Conclusions
Exposure to hazardous fuels is easily quantified with a single thematic layer and aligns well with subsequent fires in Boreal, Foothills and Rocky Mountain natural regions. The resulting fire exposure metric is a numeric rating of the potential for fire transmission to a location given surrounding fuel composition and configuration, irrespective of weather or other fire controls. Exposure can be compared across geographic regions and time periods; and used in conjunction with other metrics of fire controls to inform the study of landscape fire.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference86 articles.
1. Ager AA, Vaillant NM, Finney MA, Preisler HK (2012) Analyzing wildfire exposure and source–sink relationships on a fire prone forest landscape. For Ecol Manag 267:271–283
2. Ahmed MR, Rahaman KR, Hassan QK (2018) Remote sensing of wildland fire-induced risk assessment at the community level. Sensors 18:1570
3. Albini FA (1979) Spot fire distance from burning trees—a predictive model. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-56. https://www.frames.gov/documents/behaveplus/publications/Albini_1979_INT-GTR-056_ocr.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2020
4. Amiro BD, Logan KA, Wotton BM, Flannigan MD, Todd JB, Stocks BJ, Martell DL (2004) Fire weather index system components for large fires in the Canadian boreal forest. Int J Wildland Fire 13:391–400
5. Baartman JEM, Melsen LA, Moore D, van der Ploeg MJ (2020) On the complexity of model complexity: viewpoints across the geosciences. CATENA 186:104261
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献