Abstract
AbstractStream channel erosion, enlargement, and habitat degradation are ubiquitous in urban watersheds with conventional stormwater management that increase channel-eroding flows relative to undeveloped watersheds. Hydrologic-based restoration aims to discharge a more natural flow regime via stormwater management interventions. Whether such interventions facilitate geomorphic recovery depends, in part, on the degree to which they restrict discharges that would otherwise contribute to channel erosion. Erosion potential (E), the ratio of post-developed to predeveloped sediment transport capacity, provides a simplified, mechanistic framework to quantify the relative influence of stormwater interventions on the geomorphic effectiveness of the flow regime. This paper compiles ca. five years of data following stormwater-based interventions in three distinct settings in the United States and Australia to demonstrate how the E framework can elucidate the role of hydrologic restoration interventions in facilitating trajectories of geomorphic recovery (or lack thereof). In a previously developed watershed with unstable streams, substantial reductions in E in one stream coincided with a trajectory of geomorphic recovery, whereas the control stream without E-reducing interventions exhibited continued instability. Furthermore, a stream downstream of a greenfield development that optimized their stormwater control measures to match the sediment transport capacity of the predeveloped regime (E = 1) was able to maintain a recovery trajectory in a legacy-impacted setting that is otherwise highly susceptible to hydromodification. Streambed material size, channel evolution stage, and the hydrogeomorphic setting also likely affect the level of E reduction necessary to promote geomorphic recovery, with coarser-grained and over-widened streams potentially needing less reduction than finer-grained and more entrenched channels. Although available space and funding will limit the ability to fully reduce E in previously developed watersheds, these case studies underscore the value of using stormwater control measures to maximize reductions in E if geomorphic stability is a goal of stormwater interventions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference97 articles.
1. Anim DO, Fletcher TD, Pasternack GB, Vietz GJ, Duncan HP, Burns MJ (2019) Can catchment-scale urban stormwater management measures benefit the stream hydraulic environment?: J Environ Manag 233(1):1–11
2. Arizona Department of Water Resources (1985) Design Manual for Engineering Analysis of Fluvial Systems. Arizona Department of Water Resources
3. Bevan V, MacVicar B, Chapuis M, Ghunowa K, Papangelakis E, Parish J, Snodgrass WJ (2018) Enlargement and evolution of a semi-alluvial creek in response to urbanization. Earth Surf Proc Land 43(11):2295–2312
4. Biedenharn DS, Elliott CM, Watson CC (1997) The WES Stream Investigation and Streambank Stabilization Handbook: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station
5. Biedenharn DS, Thorne CR, Soar PJ, Hey RD, Watson CC (2001) Effective discharge calculation guide. Int J Sedim Res 16(4):445–459
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献